Hopkins/Marquez/Mayweather - Most Skilled IYO?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Mar 2, 2009.


  1. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Most skilled of these three in your view?
     
  2. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    Mayweather.. i dont like the guy but he is the most skilled boxer i've seen since Roy jones was in his prime.
     
  3. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    pbf...how could you defeat him?
     
  4. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    Floyd...more complete.
     
  5. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Difficult question. Marquez is an amazing combination puncher, Floyd is a defensive master, and Hopkins is very clever both offensively and defensively. I'd probably go with Hopkins as he has relied on his skill and wit alone to overcome physical liabilities like declining stamina and hand speed.
     
  6. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    As far as pure skill goes, I vote Hopkins. I'd also rate him much higher all-time.
     
  7. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Defensive: Mayweather Jr.
    Offensive: J.M. Marquez
    Overall: Hopkins
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Great post.
     
  9. danlop15

    danlop15 Member Full Member

    446
    0
    Sep 6, 2008
    Floyd Mayweather is more complete, then Hopkins, then Marquez, the fact is offensively Marquez is better then Mayweather and Hopkins. Hopkins and Mayweather have better defense and don't throw punches as wide as Marquez does. You never see Mayweather or Hopkins get beat up or caught as much as Marquez does, plus they have better chins then Marquez.
     
  10. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    yeah i voted for floyd... i feel like he offers a better mix of efficient offense & efficient defense
     
  11. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    mayweather. clearly. hopkins and jmm flaws led them to lose fights. i'm not saying that pbf has no flaws, he just does a really good job of hinding them
     
  12. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    The completely obvious choice is FM.
    The obvious alternative choice would be Hopkins.
    JMM would be a very obvious 3rd choice.
    But.... JMM has done what FM couldn't/wouldn't - fight the very best and come up a winner.
     
  13. 41fever

    41fever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,811
    0
    Jul 16, 2005
    I'd say JMM because he fights cleaner. He cheats less. They are all quite skilled.
     
  14. djoc175

    djoc175 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,892
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    :lol:Valid point.

    Offensively it is JMM.PBF is more efficient with his offence.PBF is also more physically/athletically gifted than JMM.Add his defence and he may have the more well rounded skill set.
     
  15. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    For me its Hopkins