Hopkins MW resume vs Sturms MW resume. Whos is really better & who would win?

Start a topic regarding Trinidad and Joppy if you are so concerned with dodging how weak Sturm's resume is.

 

true - hopkins fight with dawson will be his 25th fight above the middleweight limit out of 60 - thats nearer 42% of his fights above the middleweight limit.

lets remember that 12 of hopkins first 17 fights were above the middleweight limit before he stuck to a continued and disciplined diet throughout his middleweight reign of one of the weakest middleweight era's ever.

 

what you scared of

stop running :rofl

 

:rofl He's pulling the "Who are his 5 best wins" bull****. that was always Failey's MO....atsch

 

****ing hell, you're really dense aren't you? Here are 5 wins by Joppy, I'm not gonna do a bunch of research since it's basically irrelevant to the point of the thread to make sure they're his five best.

Howard Eastman
Johnathan Reid
Julio Caesar Green
Rito Rubalcaba
and what the ****, throw Duran in there for name recognition.

Now how exactly does that add to the thread? Is that enough to 'prove' that Joppy, who defended or fought for the WBA and WBC MW title about 15 ****ing times is a real middleweight? You ****ing moron, why didn't you just go to boxrec yourself instead of insisting that someone list this **** for you? What do you think you're gaining?

**** I hate idiots.

 

Look at this. Stupid kid just wanted to be a pain in the ass, had no intention of trying to make any point. When am I going to learn not to accommodate these assholes??

 

When you do, throw me some tips. I still do on occasion.

 

you do know Joppy was 10-1 in World title fights prior to the Trinidad fight?

 

People diss Hopkins middleweight reign, and while most boxing people acknowledge it wasn't the golden era of middleweights, Hopkins's middleweight division was better than the current one is by far.

 

Why be scared of intelligent boxing debate? You don't have to agree, but at least make valid points to back up your position.

 

Bailey belongs in a category by himself. All we can do is marvel from afar.

 

Isn't Bailey the one who makes threads claiming Ottke was the best at the weight etc and so on? Classic troll, I don't think he's serious. Headbanger is, he's just an idiot.

 

Sturm couldnt even beat DLH, lost his last fight... lets be ****ing real, Hopkins beats the man so bad there is a warrant issued for assaulting a woman....

 

the prevailing theory out there is that, indeed, bailey is serious.