Hopkins-Pascal: Please read and respond.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mrjotatp4p, Dec 19, 2010.


  1. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    I want all the people who have boxed before to respond. Looking back on the Pascal vs Hopkins decision and with the majority thinking he was robbed. Do you think its time for former boxers, and trainers to become judges at ringside? It would also be nice to put headphones or something on them so that they can't hear the crowd cheering for punches that don't land. What say you?
     
  2. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    former boxers are still susceptible to dirty $$$'s
     
  3. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    That would probably be best, or the criteria for choosing judges has to change.
     
  4. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    thats something my 8 year old brother would say
     
  5. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    See thats why I asked for guy who have actually boxed before and go into boxing gyms to stay in shape to respond. Not ***** ass Tennis players like you. Have you joined a gym yet? YES OR NO and be honest woman.
     
  6. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Yes !Former boxers and trainers need to become judges and if you listen to the former lt heavy champ Antonio Tarver during last nights broadcast he had Pascal winning so how is it that people feel there was a robbery when he even had it for Pascal ?
     
  7. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Thats true. I just know that guys who have actually boxed or been in the gym can see whats really going on inside the ring. Something has to change.
     
  8. LOL!

    They need to take chess jockeys, mathletes, or goth kids and turn them into judges. People who don't and won't ever give a **** about pugilistic sports.

    Imagine Bernard Hopkins as a judge for a Pacquiao-Mayweather fight. Pacquiao would only win if Floyd dies in the ring.

    "To me, Pacquiao is on PEDs, so I automatically deducted 2 points from each round. I also deducted an additional point in the 3rd, 7th, and 10th round because he ducked slick African American fighters in the past."

    :deal
     
  9. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Oh yeah Tarver who has bad blood towards Hopkins. Let me get a little more specific. How about a guy like Tommy Hearns or even Roberto Duran judging a fight. I understand that problems could still come from having boxers judge but we can't deny that they know whats going on better than some old guy who has never laced them up.
     
  10. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Nobody has said one thing about Mayweather or Pacquiao you ****ing aids patient. Now Hopkins is a current fighter. How about you name me some retired fighters that could make a great judge. How about Michael Spinks or Camacho?
     
  11. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    fixed
     
  12. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    :rofl:rofl:rofl

    They do need a makeover. Having fighters as judges also gives them a job after boxing. Too many boxers become broke AZZ n*ggas.
     
  13. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    I agree Leon. :good
     
  14. dvb

    dvb Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,826
    1
    Mar 16, 2010
    whom ever the judges are if their scoring is questionable they need to release the scorecards and have to come out and explain their scoring for each and every round.