Hopkins - Pavlik

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rreed23, Jan 3, 2008.


  1. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    On what basis?
     
  2. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Kessler hits hard. Also apart from power what the hell does Kelly Pavlik do better than Kessler

    What does Antonio Tarver do better than Mikkel Kessler?

    How many Kessler fights have you seen?
     
  3. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Lewis did that to Tua and he never was hurt. Andrade has an Iron chin.

    Also answer my questions: What attributes do Tarver and Pavlik have over Kessler bar power?
     
  4. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,396
    15,428
    Jul 19, 2004
    It's bad enough that delusional Calzaghe view him as an invioncible demi-god, but equally bad is the way they grossly overrate those who Calzaghe has beaten!

    :lol:

    Kessler would have inevitably usurped Ray Ronbinson as the #1 P4P fighter of all-time had he not been forced to face Calslappy!

    Please people....SHARE THE ****ING DRUGS! I want some of whatever the **** it is you people are smoking.

    :smoke
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,396
    15,428
    Jul 19, 2004
    Versatility and defensive prowess.

    :smoke
     
  6. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Hahahahhaa. Kelly Pavlik has a better defence than Mikkel Kessler? Also is more versitile?

    Tarver is arguable about the versitility. But defencivly Kessler is much better.
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,396
    15,428
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yeah, Kessler looked like a defensive master each and every time he ate a flush punch from Calzaghe. What a brilliant tactician!

    :lol:
     
  8. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Kessler beats everybody from 160-175 bar Joe Calzaghe and Chad Dawson :good Not p4p number one of all time. But damn good.
     
  9. scott is cool

    scott is cool Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Dec 1, 2007
    How does Palvick have a better defence than Mikkel Kessler?
    Derby County have a better defence than Palvick. :rofl
     
  10. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    So what does that make Hopkins every time Roy landed? When he only had one hand :thumbsup
     
  11. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Tarver is a better counterpuncher.

    Watch that to see the variety and ability to finish oponents.
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=nJOLgeHNRwQ

    I would favour Mundine to UD Miranda.
     
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,396
    15,428
    Jul 19, 2004
    Roy hardly landed at all in that fight. Neither did Hopkins. But if you want to bring up a 15 year old fight as a 'relevant' comparison, it just further illustrates your own bias. As does your ridiculous statement claiming Kessler could beat anyone from 16-175!

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

    Hopkins owns everyone south of Cruiser until proven otherwise, and there's no way he's going to lose to a mediocre white boy like Calslappy.

    :smoke
     
  13. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Have you seen the Pavlik vs Kessler thread cocksucker? Resopnable posters? Rumsfeild hates Joe.
     
  14. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    :rofl

    Course he does. Beating a **** Tarver and a fat Winky prove that he is a beast. So does beating a limited MW in Trinidad or a LMW in Oscar. What a beast. Getting beat by Taylor once I thought says it all.

    Read it in big writing
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  15. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,396
    15,428
    Jul 19, 2004
    Anyone who Calzaghe has ever beaten is an all-time great who would beat anyone in the division range today, barring Joe the Great!

    :lol:

    But the good news is, in the EXTREMELY unlikely event that Calzaghe beats Hopkins, well....if these nutjobs are apt to grossly overrate pugs like Lacy and Kessler on the basis of Calzaghe beating him, what are they going to be saying about Hopkins? That he's Superman?

    And in the end, the worst thing about these delusions Calslappy fans is that they REFUSE TO SHARE WHATEVER THE **** IT IS THEY'VE BEEN SMOKING!~

    And that just ain't right!

    :smoke