Hopkins Robbed.........Calzaghe Overated

Again, your incessant misquoting of the facts knows no bounds. Hopkins is 43, and he lost the fight going away.

These kind of statements really discredit your entire catalog of inanities.

 

Anyone who scored that fight for Hopkins is crazy.

 

I also scored it for Hopkins, though I do not feel it was a robbery.

 

Have to agree,joe was very poor tonight,but Hopkins did not half cheat,i had Hopkins win it by a round at most,but am glad joe got the nod,never liked hopkins,you only have to listen to enzo and what he said to him before the final round to see how worried they were "you need to stop him or the fights lost" or close to that,any way such is boxing,i reckon joes come foward style and hopkins holding and other little things he did was the reasons the fight went to JoeC

 

Scored it for Hopkin's, personally.

But that's just how I viewed it, I guess.

 

You are 100% correct B-HOP clearly won the fight and took Calzaghe to school exposing his limitations. The only mistake B-HOP made was not stopping Calzaghe. As I predict Calzaghe would go down in this fight which he did heavily in round 1. I take my cap of to a great old school fighter. Enzo Calzaghe ranting and raving in the corner was rubbish and he had no clue how to advice his son. At least we now know Calzaghe true level as shown by a 43 year old past his best B-HOP.

 

Seems like classic sees this different than the general forum, by and large.

 

I did give it tp Hopkins by 1 point, i will watch it again however, but i gotta stick with my initial decision as my firm choice of how the fight went. If i was a judge i wouldnt be able to change my mind!

 

Rematch?

 

We all know which forum the reall boxing analysts are at though!!

 

Yeah, this is true.

General's full of 15 year olds, mostly.

 

Haha , cant stand the place sometimes, serious bullshiit goes on there more often than not. Too many fans of fighters rather than boxing