Hopkins Robbed.........Calzaghe Overated

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Apr 19, 2008.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    9-3, or 116-111, for JC.
     
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Shouldn't Calzaghe be credited for beating Hopkins at his own game once he adjusted? Hopkins didn't land near as cleanly for the last 3/4 of the fight as it gets made out to be.
     
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I think the problem with this fight is that there were quite a few close rounds, and much depended on what you favor more: making the fight, landing more, or landing fewer punches but accurate and hard ones while holding on all the time.

    I don't think 116-111 is an unreasonable score, but 9-3 almost makes the fight sound incompetitive. This was a competitive 9-3. An incompetitive 9-3 is for instance Lewis-Holyfield I. I think that's what is bothering a lot of people. However, i still thought it was a clear win for the Welshman.
     
  4. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    Well, if there are about 4 or 5 rounds that are very close in any given fight, with 7 or 8 slightly easier rounds to score split roughly equally among the two fighters, then it could go either way, and there's nothing clear about it.

    The HBO card explains a lot of the perception being spouted in the general forum ("Only a BHop hugger, and Calzaghe hater can score this for Hopkins!" Etc. Bull****), because most fans are sucked in by the TV people. That's not to say 9-3 Calzaghe is dead wrong or impossible, but it leads the imbeciles to believe this fight can only go one way.

    I'm a Brit, and a Calzaghe fan and generally not an admirer of Hopkins, and I scored it for Hopkins by a point.
    I agree with Ted Spoon's points, I cant reward busyness and effort if it's blatantly ineffective. A lot of those close rounds I have BHop nicking with maybe a clean punch, or two. That's how close it was.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,957
    44,841
    Apr 27, 2005
    Well my rough count for support in this thread goes 25-15 for Calzaghe. That's some decent support both ways with plenty of big name Classic posters on both sides of the fence.
     
  6. Vaile

    Vaile Member Full Member

    490
    0
    Nov 29, 2007
    I scored the first four rounds to Hopkins and also had him taking the tenth round cleanly, in between that there were a lot of close rounds that were very subjective. Either way i wouldn't have been hugely surprised. Although i do tend to favor clean punching. Hopkins by a point for me.