Hopkins says"Calzaghe would be fighting a legend, I'd just be defeating a champion!"

eubank and kessler mediocre? sums up your bias really.

 

Maybe Hopkins should just STFU and retire. Calzaghe is the biggest name and the biggest moneymaker north of middleweight and south of heavyweight. If not Calzaghe then WHO?

 

I'd love to see what Joe does to Hopkins if they fight.
Taylor threw what.. 500 punches per fight and won pretty clear UDs?
Joe is going to throw 1000+ and give Hopkins hell all night with the in and out movement, let's just see this happend. I'll bank on Joe.

 

Uh dude... You're not making any sense whatsoever this is an argument you won't win because you were so unbelievably wrong from the getgo. Go troll some other forum.

Rule 1) if people use the phrase "hahahaha" they do not have an intelligent point to make.

 

great knowledge there :good

http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:4745

 

now who's exaggerating?

 

I see no point discussing with you, since you only seem to rank boxers by wich American name fighters they have on their resume. No ill feelings, but from were I stand your logic is so flawed that we will not benefit from a discussion. I mean you don't even give Calzaghe credit for his win over Reid which was a good win not spectacular, but good.

Mind you I'm not British and not the biggest Calzaghe fan.

 

are you going to argue that the golden fishnets and tito were MW greats? how's about fatty wright and tarver, are they LHW greats?

 

I don't consider myself a Calzaghe fan honestly. I was impressed with how he handled Lacy but that performance against Kessler was just bleh. And the announcers sucking his balls didn't help either.

Infact, he looked very much like Hopkins, who I am not hot on either. As I said before, ugly ass fight if these two ever hook up.

But you have to give credit where it is due. Lacy was seen as a legitimate threat, so was Kessler. They were not gimmies, even if Calzaghe made it look that way.

 

I think just like bernard.