Hopkins v Calzaghe: The Resume

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Aug 11, 2008.


  1. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    Yeah that pathetic performance faking injury does him little credit. If it had been Calzaghe who`d done that I wonder what the reaction on this board would have been like??
     
  2. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Yea its a safe bet. Johnson would crush Hopkins in monumental fashion. Of course this is only fantasy as Hopkins would not want anything to do with Johnson now, come to think of it nobody does. I hope he eventually gets a shot at Diaconu
     
  3. mrplow182

    mrplow182 Seasoned Veteran Full Member

    3,391
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    A younger Johnson couldnt stop Clinton Woods though, who is somewhat of a punching bag
     
  4. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Crush him in monumental fashion? Johnson looked pretty good in losing to Chad Dawson (and i think pretty highly of Dawson, his future will be very interesting), but old man Hops was competitive with a fairly quality fighter in Joe Calzaghe lol.

    I think you're overrating Johnson greatly.
     
  5. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    It's precisely the opposite, that was when Lacy was so highly regarded as the SMW Tyson and favored heavily to beat Calzaghe by KO. He had something to offer him at that stage, he just got completely outclassed by a truly elite fighter.

    True, but that doesn't take away the significance of his victory over him, considering how highly rated Lacy was at the time. Calzaghe very well ruined him as a fighter.

    Tarver was in worse shape for that rematch than Hopkins was for Calzaghe, given how weight-drained he was, not to mention overall Tarver was never that good. Hopkins just didn't have the stamina at that stage of his career to deal with Calzaghe's pressure because he was so used to fighting at a set pace, but he'd always been lauded for his stamina prior, even at this age. The fight wasn't pretty, but Calzaghe's style had just as much to do with Hopkins gassing as his age. For the record I'd take a prime Hopkins over Calzaghe, but Tarver is in neither fighter's league, especially in that fight where once again, he had nothing to offer.


    The Wright fight was at a catchweight of 170, whereas Wright's natural weight was 154 and he'd been recently fighting at 160. The weight suited Hopkins a lot better, and regardless of what is being said, size does matter. Not that I think Wright would've beaten a P4P version of Hopkins, as he wasn't versatile enough, but he was the bigger man, and neither fighter was in their prime that night, it doesn't just apply to Hopkins.

    I gave him credit for the Tito win, it was probably his best at MW, though the fact that a natural WW is your best MW win says a lot about your lack of competition.

    I base it simply on the fact that Kessler was a better fighter at the higher weights than Trinidad and would've schooled him had they fought. He'd have beaten Wright as well. Not just for size reasons, but for style reasons. Kessler's career is in a bit of a hole right now so it will probably take some time to convince people of this, but just watch him fight in the meantime, he's as good technically as they come nowadays.

    He looked quite soft to me, not a whole lot of that weight was muscle.

    Not really, as Tito had only had one fight at MW against the likes of William Joppy. That doesn't inspire much confidence that he could beat any elite MW's. Tito vs Pavlik would be interesting though come to think of it.

    Johnson was nothing at the time, and even nowadays isn't as good an overall fighter as Kessler. I'm rating Kessler mainly on ability, you're rating him on title and paper work, that's the difference.
     
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Hopkins has the better wins. Neither man has a really good list of W's on their record though. If you combined the records, Kessler is probably the toughest opponent out of all 93 wins. It's probably evened out by the fact that Calzaghe never lost to a fighter of Taylor's calibre, though.

    I'd probably rate them about the same. Like I said, Hopkins has the better wins but has losses. Calzaghe never really fought the best out there which hurts him.

    Although one think I do fnid funny is how people have differing opinions on both guys statistical record. Hopkins always gets lauded for having so many defences over such a long period, yet with Calzaghe the usual response is "Yeah, but they were against Euro bums". Typical ignorant reply.

    But whatever. Both men have had mediocre careers for elite fighters.
     
  7. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    I think Pavlik wins this one pretty easily. I don't think Trinidad could hurt Pavlik at 160lbs, and the same can't be said in reverse. I imagine Pavlik would outbox a timid Tito, before stopping him in 8.
     
  8. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    I don't think Tito would've been timid at all. I think Tito proved his power at 160 and could definitely hurt Pavlik, who doesn't have a strong chin in the first place. The same could be said of Tito though, as Pavlik is definitely capable of hurting him. Neither is extremely skilled, so it's either come down to Pavlik's reach advantage oor Tito's brawling ability and hooks to put the other away. I'd probably tale Pavlik at MW to be safe, but it's not an easy call the way I see it.
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Yes, I have been on boxrec. As Eubank was brought up in this discussion, I remember Eubank was fighting bums after he lost twice to Collins, but rather than just say "he fought two bums", I got their actual names and records. Oh the SHAME of being specific...
     
  10. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    So you aren't going to acknowledge the Thompson fights then? :huh
     
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    It is clear you are a casual boxing fan who regurgitates shite you read on here, as you have no idea what you are talking about.

    Pac v Barrera I: Barrera was 29 and was p4p#3. In the couple of years leading up to that fight, Barrera had wins over Hamed (top 10 p4p), Tapia (HOF) and Morales (top 10 p4p).

    Fights with Morales: HOFer and p4p staple Erik Morales was either 29 or 30 for the 3 fight series. Only the 13-14 years younger than Hopkins when Calzaghe fought him.

    JM Marquez: If you had ever bothered to watch his fights and his career, you would know he was young enough in the Pac fights to fight 12 intense rounds against a top-quality opponent, and that the guy has got better with age. Of course decline is inevitable at some point, but it isn't showing yet.


    WTF has De La Hoya got to do with this debate????


    Woodhall was an Olympic bronze medallist?! REALLY?!?! Oh my God, I can't believe I've been downgrading that win as a routine victory over a domestic level fighter of extreme mediocrity.
    I thought Woodhall won a world title by outpointing a 40+ year old man with 10 losses on his record, and lost it in his 2nd or 3rd defence. I didn't realize he had won a BRONZE AMATEUR medal. I'm so embarrassed. My apologies.



    Laughable.
     
  12. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I saw both of the Thompson fights. It was heartbreaking to see a once great fighter struggle so badly against a guy with about 5% of his ability. Age and size beat him even though he put up an amazing effort.
     
  13. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Of course I saw the Eubank fight. Eubank gave Calzaghe more trouble than he was able to give Collins. That's when I started to have doubts about Joe. Those doubts increased after the Robin Reid fight. Then they faded away again as Calzaghe spent 7 years fighting binmen and taxi drivers and lumberjacks.
     
  14. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest


    I really don't have time today Pea, to get right into this, so I'll have to keep it brief:

    I think the Glen Johnson of the Dawson fight or the Antonio Tarver of the Woods fight beats Mikkel Kessler right now.

    I think if Calzaghe had fought and beat Pavlik, it would almost have been as good a win as Hopkins's win over Trinidad- but Joe hasn't fought anyone as good as Trinidad or Pavlik.

    Lacy was hyped by a magazine for a few months- so what? The cold hard fact is he was a severely limited fighter with good power. His career has been poor, and should preclude him from being spoken of as top opposition.
     
  15. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    It's quite unbelievable to see how clueless you are unless you are just blinded by your hidden hate for Joe Calzaghe.

    It's impossible to debate with someone like you.