Hopkins vs. Calzaghe: Punch By Punch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Dec 22, 2008.


Page 11 of 20
  1. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    I gave up wasting my time trying to reason with you a long time ago radar :yep

    For any time I presented irrefutable evidence contrary to your self-aggrandising shite ("several levels above" indeed :lol:) you would start to ***** and moan and cry and mention admin and banning and then have the hide to accuse me of spamming :lol:

    Fella, you are by your very nature a spammer, but you think cloaking your spamming, trolling and flaming in feigned boxing knowledge fools everyone :lol: The only person who believes your shite is you

    What an arse-bandit you are...at least send away for a blow up doll and develop another interest in life buddy - you're ****ing obsessed :nut
     
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    #151
  2. ali's jockstrap

    ali's jockstrap Member Full Member

    302
    0
    Nov 24, 2008
    out of curiosity did you count the 'phantom low blow' which hopkins used as an excuse to try and cheat as an effective blow or not?
     
    ali's jockstrap, Dec 23, 2008
    ali's jockstrap, Dec 23, 2008
    #152
  3. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007

    So what you are saying is that basically most of the worlds boxing fans are idiots?

    **** sake man, in the case of san rafael (plus one douchebag) vs Everyother ****. In the case of Mikkel Kessler vs Anthony Mundine you are saying that everybody is wrong about the fight bar you, including Mundine, who though he lost.

    If that does not strike you as crazy then I do not know what will.

    What do you hope to achive by this thread btw?

    Personally I think that the only thing you achieve is to make yourself look like an arrogant wanker.
     
    196osh, Dec 23, 2008
    196osh, Dec 23, 2008
    #153
  4. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Wait a minute...spammy thinks Mundine beat Kessler?


    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    #154
  5. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    I have already stated here in this thread, and otherwise, that the issue of scoring shots is not one dimensional. It was how and when those shots got applied during the fight. Clean and effective punching is not 100% of scoring - agreed. It's only 95%. You want to know the point of the thread? Truly? Watch the fight again with proper scoring. Recognize the difference between effective aggression and ineffective aggression. Recognize the true meaning of ring generalship. Calzaghe may have been coming forward - and at certain points he was the ring general and he was being effective. However, at other points Calzaghe was coming foward, but it was Hopkins who was the ring general and the one fighting effectively. Comprende? The scoring shots are most certainly not every part of the equation.
     
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    #155
  6. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007


    :yep
     
    196osh, Dec 23, 2008
    196osh, Dec 23, 2008
    #156
  7. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Don't be so melodramatic and childish. The numbers speak for themselves. The facts speak for themselves.
     
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    #157
  8. jcrh22

    jcrh22 Active Member Full Member

    1,149
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    1 you are talking crap, just reviewed one round (7) and you don't count all the punches. 2 when is it decided that it is only punches that count in professional boxing? are you thinking of the am's, what about the fact Joe is controlling the fight from round 5 onwards.
     
    jcrh22, Dec 23, 2008
    jcrh22, Dec 23, 2008
    #158
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    No SPAM. Make a real post for a change. For ****s sake..
     
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    #159
  10. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    These numbers you refer to, however, are based on your opinion :deal

    Do you understand the concept of objectivity or not?
     
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    #160
  11. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007

    See the sentences with the "?" at the end they are questions.

    Answer them.
     
    196osh, Dec 23, 2008
    196osh, Dec 23, 2008
    #161
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Elaborate in detail. I'd like to hear this. Glad you had a look. I don't follow the rest.. Restate that if you can.
     
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    #162
  13. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    The part in bold is the bit I hope to see evoke the dawning of reality in your eyes, spammy :yep

    Also, please advise exactly when it was decided by the major boxing federations that effective punching made up 95% of the scoring criteria :think
     
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    #163
  14. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    LOL, I'm being asked about objectivity by the least objective, least informed **** on this forum. Funny ****. Opinion?? Hardly. There's nothing subjective about a scoring punch. The quality of a punch is subjective, how much damage a punch does is subjective. The fact that a punch is a scoring punch isn't the least bit subjective.

    What do I hope to achieve? You're telling me that I've said that all boxing fans are idiots? These are the questions you want answers to? GTFOH. Give me real questions. Not argumentative crap.
     
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    san rafael, Dec 23, 2008
    #164
  15. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    See spammy? You go abusive or MIA whenever I bother to post something you call 'real' :lol:

    YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!

    This content is protected
     
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    IrnBruMan, Dec 23, 2008
    #165
Page 11 of 20