Hopkins vs. Calzaghe: Punch By Punch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Dec 22, 2008.


  1. thatoldhate

    thatoldhate Member Full Member

    178
    0
    Dec 12, 2008
    listen guy u dont know what ur talking about lol. he hit joe low so he could get some air back and thats it. joe never once had hopkins hurt which was what the first guy was trying to say. get ur facts straight bucko. happy kwanza

    :cool:
     
  2. elmbloke

    elmbloke New Member Full Member

    34
    0
    May 15, 2008
    ok let's disagree. but please just point to the bit where i said hopkins was hurt.
     
  3. thatoldhate

    thatoldhate Member Full Member

    178
    0
    Dec 12, 2008
    oh, lol it was u!

    what is an effective punch? 1 that hurts some1 right? lol

    hopkins wasnt hurt he hit low to get some air i dont see how some1 can think otherwise. the pace joe set was too much, not his punch power
     
  4. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    lool!!!!!. can you get your stats out for the amount of holding to the body and arms, running away and faking low blows etc etc.
     
  5. The_Hitman92

    The_Hitman92 EST & Registered 2008 Full Member

    460
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    Calzaghe won the fight, end of.
     
  6. elmbloke

    elmbloke New Member Full Member

    34
    0
    May 15, 2008
    i think something is getting lost in translation...

    1. i never said hopkins was hurt.
    2. i never said hopkins hit calzaghe low. i said he feigned a low blow. he acted as if he had been injured from a low blow.
    3. are you saying that the punches/slaps/tickles landed by calzaghe would have had no effect on hopkins? i mean with regard to tiredness not 'hurt'.
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    But there was no deduction brainiac, so again I say why the **** would anyone have scored it 9-9? And as Calzaghe did not dominate the rest of the round, it was, as I have already said, a 10-8 automatic.

    "Lol" at idiots like you.
     
  8. joekirkbycobra

    joekirkbycobra King Of The Ring Full Member

    3,966
    2
    Jan 4, 2008
    i thought b-hop won but ther wasnt loads in it and could have gone either way
     
  9. BRIT08

    BRIT08 P4P Full Member

    432
    0
    Apr 20, 2008
    uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh??????!!!?!?!???

    Calzaghe landed a punch?????

    I must of missed that one.
     
  10. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    San Rap you are a pathetic idiot.

    I just watched the fight again and agreed with Ledermans analysis. It wasn't even close and if hoppy didn't try and ***** his way to a DQ win by faking the low blow, JC ends it in the 10th.
     
  11. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    lederman couldnt analyse a pre school nativity play he's never objective when it comes to hopkins he scored winky-bhop a draw for christs sake
     
  12. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    he got Calzghe-hoppy 100% correct!
     
  13. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    why because you said so??
     
  14. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    watch it again without the hoppy colored glasses. hopkins did **** when it counted, aside from holding, using his head, and faking low blows. yea, the marks of a truly great one....:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  15. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    TFFP, the difference between people who are great at stuff, and people who are just passing, is hard work and practice. Think real hard about that. I regularly invest hours and hours of research in boxing matches. There's a reason I'm several levels above you, and it isn't luck. I say that with all due respect and encouragement because you have good potential.