Hopkins vs. Clazaghe: Who's the more accomplished fighter

Damnit, i misread the question... Hopkins is the most accomplished.

 

Well...this is a pointless thread, isn't it?

You'd have to be a nutty nuthugger of Calzaghe to say he's accomplished more...:huh

 

If he sticks around for more than he's saying, he'll end up accomplishing more.

Nice leaving out the embarassing losses to Jermain Taylor and Hopkins' shitty overall competition with all of those belts and merit's.

 

Calzaghe is too smart/proud to stick around too long. He cares for that "0" more than for anything. He won't risk it, not for any amount of money; it's his pride and joy.

 

Obviously Hopkins, but they are not a million miles apart. Any particular reason you made this thread Reg?

 

serious question. are these actual recognised terms used by boxing magazines/journos/websites/boxing broadcasts etc.

or something you've just made up? :huh

 

:

 

No, he fought everybody he should have, all I'm saying is that you listed out all of those belts and merits to make his comp look better, including those two extremely overrated victories over former Welterweight's, without even wanting to be unbiased towards some of the negatives.

But here is my take.

As it stands, Hopkins has accomplished more, not by a whole lot, but by a reasonable amount. Calzaghe obliterating him and then beating Dawson, would sky rocket Calzaghe over him, that is all.

 

I make **** up all the time, particularly p4p rankings...I see no problem with that!:bart

 

Because Hopkins is about to get raped in the ring for the first time and they can't stand that it's going to be the criminally underrated Calzaghe and not some easy to relate to American fighter who they've been mouth fed from day 1.

That's why the hopkins fans are re-assuring themselves. Us Calzaghe fans are having a field day toying with them.:yep

 

Sure - Hopkins.

But if Calzaghe beats Dawson and say Pavlik the would be on even terms with Calzaghe edging a bit a head I would say.


:good