Hopkins vs Haye: Hopkins will get the beating of his life.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HENDO, Apr 4, 2010.


  1. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    Schaefer is not a trainer, he's not a boxing expert. He's a business man and a friend of Hopkins. I wouldn't put much stock into what he says on the matter. Ask yourself this, if Hopkins didn't care about getting his ass kicked and just wanted a payday, why didn't he call out one of the Kilts? Surely they would present a bigger payday. And if Hopkins is such and easy fight for Haye, why would they completely dismiss the idea? No fight outside of the Klits at HW would draw as much interest as that fight. Why not just take the easy payday in the even he couldn't land one of the Klits?
     
  2. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    When have you ever known Hopkins to just throw names out there? He doesn't do that.
     
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    He's a world champ, of course he's skilled. I wouldn't describe him as very skilled though.
     
  4. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    My argument is not that Hopkins would neccesarily beat Haye, I'm saying this would be a competitive fight. Haye is not special either. This guy has beaten nobody. He punches really hard and has good speed, he really isn't all that special though.
     
  5. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,280
    15,100
    Dec 6, 2008

    It's the combination of things. First off Haye is way too big. Calzaghe didn't have a strong punch with those bad hands, Pavlik too slow and not mobile enough and moved up in weight. Tarver, good fighter, not exceptional, bigger than hops but not by a lot. Haye hits 20X times harder than Pavlik and is pretty fast. He KO's BHop.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I don't think its necessarily a competitive fight but I just don't see how Hopkins can get sparked. Impossible. He is impossible to hit clean and he can probably put on 25lbs quite well. I see this as a distance fight, or a possible late RTD win for Haye. I would bet teh over on this fight which would also cover any potential upset and would probably give good odds.

    Even though Hopkins is old, he is like lightning compared to John Ruiz, don't forget that.
     
  7. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    How is Haye way too big? There isn't much difference in reach or height. How many times are people going to make this mistake? Haye has never fought anyone with half the talent of even a 45 year old Hopkins. This is exactly why Haye should not even entertain the thought of fighting Hopkins. Everyone would assume he would destroy Hopkins, and that probably wouldn't happen.
     
  8. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,280
    15,100
    Dec 6, 2008
    THat's all he needs considering his size and BHop's age.
     
  9. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    But you consider Dawson to be special?

    What kind of intangibles does Dawson bring to the table other than being a technically polished defensive fighter.

    He doesn't have punching power, doesn't know how to fight aggressively, and in all likelyhood will not make a smooth transition to higher weight classes.

    Haye may not be as technically polished, but he has more dimensions than Dawson. He can box coming foward and backwards. I mean, did you see Tarver vs Dawson? It was a terrible fight because neither man knew how to engage. Dawson won because he was the younger man, and not in a convincing fashion. He definitely didn't beat Tarver the way B Hop did.

    Haye does have defensive lapses, but he has power in both hands, and is a Pacquiao type puncher. He probably doesn't hit quite as hard as Klitschko, but he has speed and power. He throws the types of punches that make you see white.

    He's the closest puncher we've had to Mike Tyson since Mike Tyson.

    If Haye can polish up his defense, he will be the unified heavyweight champ. Even as he is right now, he has a very good chance of dethroning the Klitschkos.

    And I know those are big ifs, to say someone like Dawson could beat Haye is more ludicrious than saying Hopkins can beat him. And while I'll give Hopkins the benefit of the doubt because it's Hopkins, Dawson has no chance. He's too one and doesn't have the power to gain Haye's respect.

    The only guys that have given Haye trouble in the past are guys that can take serious beatings and isn't afraid to dish it out in return.

    Dawson will lay against the ropes and let Haye unload on him. Haye will eventually knock him out.

    Haye is a special fighter. Unpolished, but special.
     
  10. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Haye is a 2 division champ and IMO is clearly better than Taylor and is a lot bigger, while Hopkins is simply a lot older, I don't see it going well for him at all. Now If he could fight Ibragimov, Chagaev or any other Ruiz- level Euro guy who brings nothing to the table, I would agree with you. But Haye and the Klits have the belts.
     
  11. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Dawson, while not as powerful as Haye is clearly better IMO, he has no flaws in his game and would beat the tar out of Hopkins. Haye is very good but not quite Dawson's level which doesn't matter because he is still too much for 45 yr old Bernard.
     
  12. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,280
    15,100
    Dec 6, 2008
    Jermaine Taylor is not that great a fighter but athletic and fast enough to give old bernard tons of trouble. Haye's a lot bigger, hits much harder and is pretty fast himself. Come on, don't say reach and height, who's bigger Williams or Tyson? I know it's not that extreme but you get my point. Yeah it is possible Haye wouldn't want this fight because he knows BHop's a crafty dude and he could look bad.

    But two things though, against Pavlik, BHop didn't need a lot of holding, he just outclassed him, but against faster fighters he does, and as I said, Haye is stronger/bigger and I don't know how good BHop will be able to hold and spoil the fight in that situation, he could be (probably would be) manhandled in clinches. Make the fight in the UK lol, he cannot win over there. Here? Well maybe a DQ, Haye retaliates with a rabbit punch and Hops could fake a KO. I'm half kidding, **** it could happen.
     
  13. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    First of all I never said Hopkins would be a piece of cake for Haye. But eventually Haye would beat him and there's a very good chance he would do it in brutal fashion.

    Secondly, Hopkins didn't call out the Klits because obviously he knows he would lose even bigger vs a Klitschko. Plus, the Klitschkos would never fight Hop, and Bernard knows this. It would not only be an utterly meaningless fight for the Klits, but it could even backfire at them in terms of popularity.

    All in all, my guess is that Bernard thinks Haye is the biggest payday he could get before retiring, and it wouldn't make him look that bad in losing like it would vs a Klitschko. That said, I'm still not convinced Hopkins and his people really want a fight with Haye.
     
  14. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Another factor is, nobody outside hardcore boxing fans are going to be interested in a Dawson-Hopkins fight.

    Dawson isn't exactly a fan favorite. And a fight between Hopkins and Dawson would not be very entertaining. It would be Hopkins feinting often, and Dawson getting frusterated, eventually baited into following Hopkins around the ring, getting countered with right hands, and clinches.

    Dawson is the same guy that could barely get passed an ancient Johnson the first time, and Johnson is a pressure fighter. He's not exactly the type of fighter that gets better with age with that particular style.

    I don't see what your obsession with Dawson is. Solid fighter yes. PFP tallent sure. But special? No.

    He's not a guy that is going to translate to a different division unless it's weak, and he certainly doesn't have the frame to become a heavy.

    He is a guy that may go undefeated for a long time, (who is there to fight?), but won't be a guy that's very entertaining and he'll often look vulnerable.
     
  15. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Dawson is more polished defensively, but there are flaws in his game.

    He can't fight moving foward. He tried against Tarver, who is a counterpuncher himself, and looked completely out of his element. He put his hands up in a high guard and walked in straight lines.

    I've never seen Hopkins do that, and Hopkins did have to be aggressive against Tarver at times, which is part of the reason why he looked so dominant.

    Dawson is a great athlete, and he can fight very well off the backfoot, but he does have flaws. And another thing, he's not a puncher.

    He's no threat at all to David Haye.