I see Kessler coming out trying to use his best weapon, which is the jab, and he finds it hard to do as Hopkins' lateral movement and overall ring mastery makes this almost impossible for Kessler. Then frustrated, Kessler might try to come forward and make it more of an in fight. That would be a mistake as Hopkins is the better in fighter. I don't see how Hopkins loses. He's not going to let a robotic, 1-2 guy beat him. Kessler's great but not against a master like Hopkins.
Fair enough I can accept that explanation. I do think that Kessler is underrated on the inside and that was seen against Calzaghe who had trouble setting Kessler up on the inside. Also I give Kessler more props for his footwork and ringsmarts than you do, but if Hopkins can make Kessler do the chasing and Kessler fail to cut of the ring properly then I can certainly see your points. I just think that Kessler is quite good at cutting of the ring and will catch Hopkins and take advantage of his subpar stamina. Thanks for the input though :good
Honestly if i was a complete utter waste of bandwith then why would you reply? You just making yourself look stupid honestly. It doesnt matter if the other fighters dont want to fight kessler he needs to fight some competition because honestly he hasnt done anything in his division or took on anyone great except calzaghe and already we got idiots on here thats voting for kessler. All of sudden Kessler became this unbeatable robot that people think is great and he's not.
No question about it. Calzaghe is going to live to regret that choice. The poll results we have here and the general hype we're getting on this subject is all based around this concept. This thread will be getting bumped again someday soon.
You're a waste of bandwith because you're not engaging in constructive dialogue with anyone. Just shouting you're opinion an opinion not backed up by a sound argument.
They're not going to fight. Why would they fight? Why would Bernard Hopkins fight Mikkel Kessler? For what reason? There's no challenge, and Kessler has no aesthetic bonuses or benefits attached to him. Let's be serious here between us, and leave all the ****ing propoganda out of it. Why would this fight possibly happen? Really..
Kessler is far from robotic. People only criticise him because they don't want to give him credit and in doing so, give credit to Calzaghe.
Pfft.. Kessler is better than anyone around Hopkins. The only one there can even be entered into a discussion is Dawson (exceot Joe who doesnt want rematches). Kessler is better at virtually any thing than Pavlik. In fact Kessler would be Hopkins only third real opponent above 160. One was ancient (Tarver) and he lost the other one. IF Hopkins is not going to fight Joe, Dawson or Taylor (again :dead), there is noone even remotely as good as Kessler. Bernard knows this and he is not dumb.. THEREFORE the fight will probably not happen.
Aren't you the guy that started the thread?atsch San, you usually have pretty good insights but when it comes to Nard, you ride that dick and you ride it hard, and cup the balls. Why wouldn't you want to see this fight? Especially since you started this thread?