HOPKINS vs PASCAL robbery thought.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lastletter26, Dec 19, 2010.


  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Cause he's an idiot.


    Just like the judge that gave Pac a 10-7 instead of 10-6
     
  2. MJK

    MJK Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,688
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    the point system dont take account of momentum or how many round you win. You must count all round by itself and im sure you agree with that. so even if hopkins did dominate for many minutes and Pascal just get moments here and there. Round by round pointing fight makes it a close fight.
     
  3. NoCoolFool?

    NoCoolFool? Active Member Full Member

    833
    2
    Apr 1, 2006
    There is no 10-10 round scored where a knock-down is awarded.
    I've never seen such a thing? Its a 10-8 or rarer a 10-9.
    In Hops-Pascal, 2 judges scored the first 10-8, one scored it a 10-9
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    As the alt continues to post on his 3 post account.
     
  5. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Point system doesn't matter.

    Each round scored, Hopkins won the fight.
     
  6. MJK

    MJK Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,688
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    what we dont see often enough is 10-8 round with no KD. When a fighter clearly dominate another, so much that this fighter runs away, get hurts is not active at all and the other one touch with most of his hit and so, it should be a 10-8 even without a KD. Its rare so im not surprise it didnt happened, but theirs some rounds that i thought pascal did nothing at all and i would not have been angry to see a 10-8 round for hopkins. The way it was scored was a draw, not a clear win and not close to a robbery.
     
  7. MJK

    MJK Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,688
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    hmm so what your saying is that since Hopkins got more round and dominate for more time, we should not take into account the two KD? Just rethink it again.
     
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    No. What I am saying is Hopkins won MORE ROUNDS than pascal and by more, I mean, even with 2 10-8 rounds Pascal LOST because Hopkins dominated from the 3rd on.
     
  9. MJK

    MJK Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,688
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    hey i respect that, but its not a robbery, close fight it is.
     
  10. NoCoolFool?

    NoCoolFool? Active Member Full Member

    833
    2
    Apr 1, 2006
    I agree somewhat, but in Hops-Pascal, there was no round 10-8 without the two knock-down rounds. Pascal did little in some rounds, but Hopkins didn't do enough either tp justify the 10-8. Pascal was never hurt (just tired?)
    For a 10-8 round, look to Khan-Maidana, round 10
     
  11. MJK

    MJK Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,688
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    yeah, im not saying that a 10-8 round was a must, but that if some hopkins fans would use that as an argument for a hopkins wins it would be a lot better than the "omg robbery" we are hearing right now.
     
  12. lastletter26

    lastletter26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    1
    Nov 13, 2008
    I thought rounds 1 and 3 were close rounds so with the KD pascal won 10-8. I pretty much thought that was a given that if the round is close and a KD happens that the one who scored the KD wins the round hands down 10-8.

    Seeing that the judge that gave the 114-114 draw would have had to score both KD rounds for hopkins then I wonder how he scored the rest. 5 rounds to 5 after that?. I don't see Pascal winning 5 rounds out of the other 10 rounds left after excluding the 1st and 3rd round.

    Either way, IF the judge gave 10-10 for both of those rounds then that's BS. Those are pascal rounds hands down.
     
  13. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    6,396
    1
    Aug 4, 2009
    Read my post. My scorecard was 114-114 live.