Hopkins vs Pavlik

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Grant1, May 31, 2008.


  1. Grant1

    Grant1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,823
    1
    Jun 13, 2007
    Who've ya got if this was to take place in November ??

    I take B-Hop by UD.
     
  2. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    People can say what they want, but Pavlik has never fought anybody close to Hopkins style. His punches are so predictable I doubt he'd land a glove on the old ****, and Hopkins would really rough house him on the inside and have a field day countering

    The only question is whether Pavlik outworks him down the stretch

    Hopkins should take a decision.
     
  3. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,454
    1,713
    Nov 20, 2007
    At SMW? I don't think B-Hop can make 160 anymore...

    Hopkins by an ugly but wide UD. His speed is still OK, his defense is very good, masterfully takes away the jab (the key in this fight) and very good in landing perferctly timed counter-shots - everything is in his arsenal to make Pavlik pay after he misses... I can clearly see Pavlik going down - nothing huge, but those type of flash KDs that sent Calzaghe and Allen down and rocked Tarver, Winky and Taylor...
     
  4. Grant1

    Grant1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,823
    1
    Jun 13, 2007
    I dont think Calzaghe or Hopkins got nearly enough credit for their fight - both enhanced their rep in my eyes - and both would beat Pavlik.
     
  5. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007

    Is this preemptive posting?:think :rofl

    Big Bone, if Hopkins says some **** about Pavlik being a white boy to the press, no way the judges give him the decision.:hey
     
  6. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    Pavlik easy UD..
    HOPKINS don't throw ENOUGH punch nw that he is one old *******. that can work vs pitty pat Wright, but it WONT work against Pavlik
     
  7. dukestreet

    dukestreet prospect Full Member

    273
    0
    May 22, 2008
    hopkins would take a ud
     
  8. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Yes, because I know how this place works. It's going to be easy to pick the fashionable unbeaten fighter, rather than the guy that just lost. People don't consider styles, just whos nuts they'd rather suck.
     
  9. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :good

    The "nut sucking" may have been a little bitter though, lol.
     
  10. BIG WORM

    BIG WORM Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,553
    0
    Mar 23, 2008
    this forum is ruled by british people. If calzaghe has trouble against hopkins then hopkins dominates pavlik
     
  11. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    It's the only sensible answer, no? Because Pavlik not only loses to, but gets KO'd by everybody he fights.:yep
     
  12. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    british people have beautiful teeth
     
  13. rantcatrat

    rantcatrat Member Full Member

    426
    0
    May 23, 2008
    First, this fight won't happen because Pavlik is content with remaining at middleweight and Hopkins for physical reasons can't drop down to middleweight. Hopkins in his prime would probably beat Pavlik, but that wasn't the question. Right now, Pavlik would knock him out in the mid-late rounds. Don't forget Taylor beat Hopkins twice and Pavlik dominated Taylor. Think about it: why did Calzaghe get the decision over Hopkins? Because he threw a ton of punches - Pavlik would do the same thing, except Pavlik doesn't slap. His punches actually hurt.
     
  14. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    id hope pavlik,but i could see hopkins sneakin this 1.
     
  15. marauder1999

    marauder1999 Champion Full Member

    1,994
    1
    May 3, 2007
    :lol: :lol: :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl