Hopkins Wright, where dose the winner stand historicaly?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Jul 21, 2007.



  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,046
    Feb 15, 2006
    To what extent is the winners legacy enhanced?
     
  2. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    196
    Feb 5, 2005
    Personally I think the win would mean a lot more for Winky than Hopkins. Hopkins to me rose a couple of notches with his win over Tarver, but beating the likes of ODH and Winky to me are less impressive, given the size differences. For me I don't really see any upside for a Hop win, only downside if he losses, which was the exact opposite in the Tarver fight, where he had no downside if he lost and only upside by winning.
     
  3. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    Both greatly, and a loss wont hurt Hopkins as much as Wright but not badly.
     
  4. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    56
    Aug 26, 2004
    Hopkins legacy is already sealed.

    He's way past his prime now and if Wright loses it likely just says more about him than any sudden new-found prowess on Hops part.
     
  5. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    65
    Nov 8, 2004
    Let's wait and see how each man looks first.

    If either man looks bad, nothing in their legacies will be enhanced.

    I'm actually expecting both guys to look bad, but funnily enough that may make for a more interesting fight, as there should be more openings for both to exploit.
     
  6. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,290
    1,981
    Jul 11, 2005
    Well, B-Hop has proven he's a better more clever and technically efficient fighter. Wright couldn't adjust to his tactics, and just kept wasting his time in close, where he needed to create space between himself and Hop. Taylor and DLH got the space they needed (fighting from distance), Wright didn't.
     
  7. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,108
    Oct 22, 2006
    I would say Hopkins is knocking on the door of Greatness. Give it 15/20 years and I think we will get a definitive answer as to if he is Great.
     
  8. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    11,527
    2,678
    Dec 18, 2004
    His two losses to Taylor still look bad.
     
  9. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,108
    Oct 22, 2006
    Hence the reason you need 20 years or so before you can judge. Taylor may become a phenom himself (unlikely I know); and if Taylor did, the close defeats would not seem so bad...
     
  10. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    11,527
    2,678
    Dec 18, 2004

    Fair enough. But Taylor's doesn't have the look of an all-time great, at least not yet.
     
  11. Stewbear

    Stewbear Active Member Full Member

    538
    5
    May 5, 2006
    Who is the most boring fighter of all time?
     
  12. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,075
    22
    Jul 21, 2004
    Hopkins just beat a top 5 P4P fighter. It doesn't what goes down, he left with the W. When you are 42 years old and arguably the best P4P fighter in the world, you are pretty much one of the baddest men on the planet.

    Hopkins is forging a legacy that will put him down as one of the very greatest fighters boxing has ever seen.
     
  13. Stewbear

    Stewbear Active Member Full Member

    538
    5
    May 5, 2006
    Only names Trinidad, Oscar and Winky all naturally smaller than him.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,262
    35,055
    Apr 27, 2005
    :patsch
     
  15. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,108
    Oct 22, 2006
    :huh