How accurate are you in your pre fight predictions?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Martini643, Jul 31, 2008.


  1. Martini643

    Martini643 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,457
    1
    Aug 31, 2004
    I'd say that I'm right about 70% of the time when picking the winner. I've gotten better over the years and its taken hundreds of fights to get there. Do you think that you would make a good boxing analyst?
     
  2. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    Im usually right 90% of the time and im not scared to go against the flow. I like to analyse past fights to make my prediction.
     
  3. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,023
    18,286
    Jul 29, 2004
    Apparently 80% of boxing matches go the way they were supposed to. As in the betting favourite takes it 80% of the time.

    Id be close to that, probably slightly less. Sometimes I go into this long-winded analysis of why a fighter will win and base it on all this evidence and get it totally wrong. Thats why I love boxing.
    But Ive done well or won my fair share of tipping comps.
     
  4. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
  5. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,963
    514
    Oct 15, 2007
    I'm better then Atlas! :lol:
     
  6. gottagivafight

    gottagivafight When you least expect it, expect it!!! banned Full Member

    6,566
    1,792
    Jun 14, 2008
    **** poor cause I'm a natural underdog fan, much to the result of my shity lookin' savings account. Example, I knew deep down Diaz was gonna lose to Pac but bet on the kid anyway. The only good thing about bein' an underdog fan is that it's absolutely ****in' awesome when you win. But that's about it.
     
  7. papolamuerte

    papolamuerte Yo soy La Muerte! Full Member

    3,257
    5
    Apr 21, 2008
  8. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    I guess 70% is a fairly honest assessment. I picked Margarito over Cotto, Mayweather over Hatton (duh), but picked Hopkins over Calzaghe, and Kessler over Calzaghe.
    Prediction in advance: I think if Pavlik fights Hopkins at 175 it's going to be a much, much more difficult fight for him than people are predicting.
     
  9. A Rock

    A Rock SAMUEL ETO'O!!!!! Full Member

    1,270
    1
    Apr 25, 2008
    yeah id say 75% of the time. you have to take your personal preferences for a fighter out of the equation. thats why even though cotto is my dude i expected margo to beat him.
     
  10. djrock247

    djrock247 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,762
    0
    Nov 12, 2004
    First honest response!

    The truth is that to fairly guage the accuracy of your predictions you have to throw out the no-brainers. I predicted Floyd Mayweather would beat Arturo Gatti. Am I Nostradamus? Anytime there's a 2 to 1 betting lne and you take the favorite, that doesn't count. If you pick the dog like a lot of people picked Margo over Cotto (hooray for you, I didn't) then that's something to brag about. In THOSE fights, anybody who picks more than 55% can make a KILLING betting on boxing. Fact is, few do.
     
  11. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    95% but I only tend to remember the times I'm right.
     
  12. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007
    If I'm not a fan of the fighters then I'm usually pretty good , but I'm a slave to my emotions and if one of my faves is fighting I find it hard to pick against them !
     
  13. djrock247

    djrock247 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,762
    0
    Nov 12, 2004
    Well said. That's exactly the way most of US (me too) are.
     
  14. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    I seem to be getting worse. 60%
     
  15. standing 8

    standing 8 Active Member Full Member

    1,396
    0
    Sep 9, 2007