How are judges supposed to award a round in the 10-point system?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JabCross727, Aug 13, 2008.


  1. JabCross727

    JabCross727 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,912
    124
    Jun 14, 2008
    I want to understand the order in which judges consider what they see in order to award the round to the better fighter. I know they see punches landed, aggression, and defense. But I was wondering if someone could clarify it more and suggest which aspects of the fight are the most important when scoring.
     
    JabCross727, Aug 13, 2008
    JabCross727, Aug 13, 2008
    #1
  2. Seven Chance

    Seven Chance Augustus Style Journeyman Full Member

    1,626
    0
    Apr 1, 2008
    Clean effective punching is suppose to be the main thing. Listen to Harlod Letterman he always says that.
     
    Seven Chance, Aug 13, 2008
    Seven Chance, Aug 13, 2008
    #2
  3. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,844
    12
    Mar 7, 2006
    fighter a and b rd 1 feeling out rd not much action, fighter a landed 6 jabs while fighter b landed 5 jabs who gets the rd?

    I say its 10-10 rd as no one dominated the rd. I say more rds where nothing of consequence happens or there is little action should be scored 10-10 rds.

    there is a difference between ring generalship and just going foward or running. Ring generalship consists of using footwork and hand speed to control distance and out punch your opponent while making him miss.
     
    RafaelGonzal, Aug 13, 2008
    RafaelGonzal, Aug 13, 2008
    #3
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    It depends on the money, we have the best judges money can buy.
     
    Farmboxer, Aug 13, 2008
    Farmboxer, Aug 13, 2008
    #4
  5. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    :lol:
     
    CJLightweight, Aug 13, 2008
    CJLightweight, Aug 13, 2008
    #5