How athletic was Joe Frazier?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dayuum, Jan 19, 2014.


  1. clinikill

    clinikill Active Member Full Member

    728
    771
    May 24, 2010
    At what point in the swimming video does Joe "nearly drown"? He looks extremely inexperienced, but at no point was he in danger of drowning, based on what I saw.
     
  2. Monogamous STD

    Monogamous STD Ya know, Quasimoto predicted all this. Full Member

    1,385
    132
    Mar 21, 2012
    It almost doesn't make sense that he can be what he was as a boxer and it translated THAT BADLY to everything else.
     
  3. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Obviously he was athletic enough to achieve what he did at boxing. How fast he could run, swim, or how much weight he could lift above his head makes no difference.
     
  4. Vinegar Hill

    Vinegar Hill Guest

    I don't think it matters one iota how athletic or unathletic Frazier was.
    It's how effective he was, and he was probably the greatest heavyweight inside pressure fighter / swarmer there ever was.
     
  5. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,498
    7,267
    May 18, 2006
    Joe struggled at sports he was woefully inexperienced at /ill equipped to do...big f***ing deal.

    Holding that against Frazier is like marking Michael Jordan down as a basketballer because he was **** at table tennis.

    Joe was a brilliant athlete because he excelled at his chosen sport (arguably the toughest and most grueling sport of all) and he overcame some severe physical limitations to do so.

    To say otherwise is nonsense.
     
  6. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,459
    9,449
    Jul 15, 2008
    It's a fairly interesting doc ...
     
  8. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,325
    11,717
    Mar 19, 2012
    Or baseball :yep
     
  9. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    Burt Reynolds hanging around Joe Frazier's entourage!!
     
  10. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
    I think you are right, FOF. You get good at something by doing it regularly, so if you lift weights you get good at lifting weights. I have worked with people in labouring jobs who could out lift me in the gym, but they couldn't keep up with me doing the job. On the other hand, I have done a job that was new to me like digging, and been completely ****ed! Yet guys who are used to it can do it all day.

    Some people will make the footage out to be a sign that Frazier was not an athlete and this may be true, but he was a fighter; a very specific type of conditioning is required for that.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    HE,

    You could view it the other way around. Judging how Bonevvna nearly finished Frazier, he's not taking Jeffries punches. I do not think Frazier hit harder than Fitz, who never came close to flooring Jeffries. Frazier's durability or lack thereof has been discussed before.

    Frazier was down and hurt in the Olympics, and as amateur, in addition being to taking an 8 count vs. a no-name and stunned by merely average hitters when they landed as a pro's.

    Frazier had the heart of a lion, but just an average type of chin and had swelling issues. His career conveniently avoided matches with other punchers not named Foremen.

    Back to how athletic was Frazier; it’s how you define it. Frazier had the stamina of a rock and roll musician in his prime, the ability to athletically bob and weave, and very good hand speed. So if hand speed, flexibility, and stamina are part of being athletic, Frazier had that.

    Most heavyweight champions are not great athletes in a track and field or weight room sense. This is why I laugh when some suggest that the NBA or Baseball is stealing from boxing. No way! Football, perhaps.

    I have debated this before, and it comes down to this. To be a heavyweight, you have to deal with being hit hard and have some guts. If a top athlete does have this, he'll flunk out of boxing as soon as he's tested.
     
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,459
    9,449
    Jul 15, 2008
    I disagree with you on this one .. Frazier fought in the most aggressive manner with the highest level of risk and did it with one eye for almost his entire career .. In 27 rounds Bonavena hurt him in only one of them. He took the best bombs of a flat footed Ali, the same Ali that KO'ed Foreman, stopped Lyle and flattened Bonavena. I think he had far more than an average, actually a pretty terrific one ..
     
  13. frank

    frank Active Member Full Member

    688
    3
    Jul 12, 2012
    athletic enough to throw a perfect left hook!
     
  14. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,325
    11,717
    Mar 19, 2012
    I agree. Frazier had an excellent chin and was one of the most durable heavyweight champions.
     
  15. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,498
    7,267
    May 18, 2006
    Frazier's chin was very good.

    You can't fight in that style with a jaw like a Seth Mitchell or Michael Grant (genuinely poor chins)because you inevitably have to take punches to deliver your own when you're built like Joe or Rocky or even Mike Tyson.

    The punches Frazier withstood from Ali in rounds 13 and 14 in Manilla was incredible I think. They were hard, fast, flush shots delivered at a blinded Joe in quick succession with no respite and Joe barely stumbled.

    Joes beating by Foreman says more about Foremans' massive power than Joes chin imo.