How big is Morales win against Pacquiao going to become?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Shake, Nov 19, 2009.


  1. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    It was 2005, not eons ago, that Morales beat Pac clearly. Pac was handicapped by a cut and his right hand wasn't as good as it is now, though I also have reservations about that.

    I feel Pacquiao might be more effective in some ways at 140 pounds and against small welters than he was at featherweight. Pac was always someone who made mistakes that could be exploited by the very elite while countering off the backfoot (Marquez, Morales) and they would use this in a way to control the athletic disadvantage they had against the physical monster that is Manny Pacquiao.

    Que the higher weights -- normally when a fighter goes up in weight as much and often as Pacquiao has, his punch is relatively lighter and his punch resistance likewise goes down somewhat. In return his speed, agility and reflexes are relatively upped when compared to the average competition.

    De la Hoya did not see Manny Pacquiao's punches coming -- someone who has always relied on a loose guard, reflexes and concentration for defense got hit at will. DLH also could not pull the trigger on the always moving, shifting Pac. Hatton was open regardless, so we'll skip him. Cotto likewise testified that he could not see the punches -- and he didn't have to, it was clear for all to see -- and it even brought on a panicky retaliation early in the fight which caused a knockdown.

    The fighters at 126 and 130 had two considerable problems when fighting Pac -- his workrate and hurtful power. It is possible for great boxers to deal with this, especially since Pac had a habit of being out of position after lunging.

    Fighters at 147 have other problems -- speed of hand and foot, still solid power, workrate. The combination of handspeed advantage at the weight and power is a mix second perhaps only to Tyson.

    So I think -- I think -- perhaps Pac brings even more to the table at 147 then he did at 126 and 130, simply because the advantages he wields tally up to a harder-to-deal-with package.

    Therefore I wouldn't credit the Morales win in full retroactively (it is still a sick win regardless) because of what Manny accomplished (and will accomplish) at 140 and above, simply because I feel it is somewhat coincidental that Pacquiao's attributes are uniquely suited for moving up, and it isn't a direct effect from him just being that good, and thus don't mean he should have outclassed everyone at 130 and below. Circumstances fit like a glove for this to happen, is what I'm saying.

    Also, if I am reading this right, and I feel no-one is going to agree, I feel that Pacquiao would beat Shane Mosley if they were to fight right now, while Mayweather and Margarito would beat him.

    How do you rank the Morales win considering recent events?
     
  2. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,984
    18,236
    Jul 29, 2004
    It has enhanced his legacy for sure.

    But it has to put into context...its not like Medgoen Singsurat is becoming greater everytime Pac wins.

    I agree that Pac looks the best Ive seen him...He is as quick, durable, fit and powerful but he is now doing it against a lower calibre of fighter who he can make look cumbersome in comparison.
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I rate it as a great win for Morales.
     
  4. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    enough to put him ahead of barrera in ATG rankings
     
  5. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    enough to put him ahead of barrera
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    No way.

    Good win for Morales, but the clear fashion in which he lost the previous two fights (although the Raheem fight/subsequent coming back down in weight MAY have attributed to that) and the fact that I feel Barrera won two of their fights...............good win for Morales, but Pac is a better fighter now then he was then. He was DAMN good then (good enough to beat what I believe to be Barrera at the height of his powers) but styles make fights and let's not forget that Winning Gloves are a different proposition to Reyes. I feel impaired when wearing pillows, Pac MUST have hated it.
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    I scored the first Morales-Pac fight to Morales by 2 points. I get the feeling that the cut affected Pacquiao, but even though that may be true, it cannot dilute Erik's win in any way. I think it's one of the best wins of the decade. Even though Erik was slightly past his absolute peak, I still view it as by far the best performance of his life, considering the quality of opponent he was in with.

    However, I firmly believe Pac has improved considerably since 2005. The current 140 version is a better fighter in pretty much every way, I don't think there is much (if any) chance of Pac right now losing to a Morales standard fighter.

    And to be honest, for reasons I won't go into as it's a dull topic, I do not believe Morales was in any way a lesser fighter when he stepped into the ring against Pacquiao second time out, and Pacquiao crushed him eventually, so that fight settled the score between Morales and a Pac without a cut as far as I see it.

    Does the win appreciate with time? Maybe to some, but not to me. It was a genuinely great win at the time, and it still is, but Pac was not unbeatable then, and he is better now than he was then.

    To me this question is kind of like saying did Salvador Sanchez's win over Azumah Nelson appreciate in value through the 80s as Nelson improved. I don't think it did, because the version of Nelson that Sal beat was not affected by any subsequent development or change in Nelson. That was a fantastic fight and very good win when it happened, and it still was in 1989, and it still is now.

    There are many, many fights which can appreciate and depreciate in value from their initial starting point, but for me Morales-Pac is not one of them. But it is a brilliant win.
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    Fantastic post and comparison:good
     
  9. rekcutnevets

    rekcutnevets Black Sash Full Member

    13,685
    344
    May 25, 2007
    I bet $50 on Morales, and won over $80. After the Marquez fight, I thought there was no way Pacquiao could beat Morales. I was shocked that he was favored. Well I wasn't shocked under the circumstances. Pac had defeated Barrera, and odds makers probably don't take style issues into consideration. I did feel like I was going to be robbing someone with that bet.

    Anyway, I ended up being surprised in that fight. Not with the outcome, but with improvement in Pacquiao from his previous fight. The importance of being more than a one handed fighter had definitely dawned on Pacquiao. Pacquiao's improvement was enough to convince me that he would win when the rematch was announced.
     
  10. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    If you felt you were robbing someone with that bet, why did you bet only $50?
     
  11. rekcutnevets

    rekcutnevets Black Sash Full Member

    13,685
    344
    May 25, 2007
    That's a huge bet for me. Normally I only bet between $5 and $20.
     
  12. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Bingo. Morales did not beat the Pacquiao you see today.
     
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,553
    Jul 28, 2004
    It was a great win of course, but it's significance is tempered a great deal by the two subsequent revenge ass beatings that Pac doled out to Morales. It's obvious that Pac has long. long ago eclipsed that version of himself.
     
  14. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I don't see it that way. Duran's victory in Montreal will forever be a great achievement, and isn't tainted by the two return bouts at all. Morales basically outboxed a guy who was good enough to beat the **** out of Marco Antonio Barrera at his best weight, and knockdown prime Juan Manuel Marquez down three times in one round, also at his best weight. Wonderful win, but it hasn't gotten any better since Pacquiao's rise in stardom. A different fighter today.
     
  15. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    great win cause pac was really on a good run back then. time flies, eh?