How can a certain group of posters, (you know who they are), be credible when...

I could post an impartial, completely correct post that everyone who reads likes and he would respond with personal attacks and tell me it's an irrelevant post with no meaning just because I posted it, then someone else could post something directly similiar and he'll compliment on it.

That's what he's all about when it comes to my posts.

 

For the most part, they are irrelevent. Really, you're not nearly as smart as you act. And yes, it IS an act you do remember? You're ONLINE persona?

PHONY!!!

 

You hear me Ams_t?

**** "supernatural" . . . I don't use that word and I don'T hype. And I don't also use the name of "GOD" to describe fighters.

You understand ???

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

 

Is it defending saying that I state your reply was immature? If I didn't like you, I wouldn't have said anything. Since I do, I pitched in.

 

You are really clueless, I like what I like. Do you want to debate music? You obviously couldn't do so Lance, when you tried to do a personal attack on my enjoyment and knowledge of my favourite musical act, calling me a johnny come lately because I didn't know of them when they came out, in which I was 11 years old, it was very off base, as usual, because you don't half know of what you are talking about and it's the same with your critique of my boxing knowledge.

Again, clueless, please learn how to extract actual information from text.

 

Yes, but you obviously understand the difference between comical hyping and seriousness, the difference between sarcastic posting and seriousness. Lance_Uppercut, does not.

 

Yeah seems so. For the most part I agree with your analysis on various boxers, but my opinion doesn't count, since i am your lapdog seemingly. Wuf, wuf...

 

I have no problem with you and your comical hyping bud . . . :good

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

****, you're a moron Lance. You must take everything at face value in life.

 

Thsi thread is as entertaining as watching midget wrestling.

 

Haven't bothered with it lately either, Gamboa and Mijares both are very well known at ESB and lots of fans who post are paying attention to them. But prior to my posting silly **** about Mijares, a lot of posters here didn't pay him much attention as they didn't buy the Pac-Solis PPV, or didn't get the sopcast and therefore didn't see the brilliance of the fighter at hand.

More guys on here paid attention to the Navarro-Mijares fight and he picked up a few good hardcore fans, as well as many people paying attention due to other people posting about him, even over at boxrec, he's well known and well liked.

So if the comical **** exposed him to a few new people, who in turn spread the word to a few new people and so on, it's well worth it, because I feel great fighters should at least get word of mouth press, which can lead to a big internet fanbase(this is a big bunch of hardcore boxing fans)and that leads to a bigger demand in general.

Every forum should have some type of novelty hyper for great fighters that get small exposure.

 

One large popcorn and a small diet Coke please.

 

He's got the style, but not the ability and intagibles, not even the skill in my opinion, from what I have viewed so far. If he improved a ton and became really fluid and unpredictable, could be.

 

Man y'all sound like two whining bitches from The Bold and The Beautiful. This is a boxing site used to discuss boxing not ***** fights...Amsterdam who gives a flying **** what Lance thinks of you, your wasting your time trying to get a an explanation. You'v prob never seen the bloke in your life and if he were to disappear of the face of this earth it prob wouldnt affect you in any way. Get over it ! Therefore, hence, in conclusion either both shut the **** up or take this lil soap opera elsewhere :thumbsup

 

I know . . . that makes forums more lively.