How can anyone argue about Marciano not being elite?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Dec 20, 2024.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,280
    11,729
    Sep 21, 2017
    Imagine if a fighter came along today. He appeared clumsy, uncoordinated and appeared to do everything wrong. But he won fights. He was undefeated against the best contenders of his division. Everytime he defended the title, it was always against a top 5 contender.

    You can't argue with the results, even if you don't like what you see on film. What makes Marciano different?
     
    ElFrutero_46 and MagnificentMatt like this.
  2. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,049
    8,105
    Jun 10, 2024
    Imagine?

    This content is protected
     
  3. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,614
    8,585
    Sep 19, 2021
    I just don't understand Wilder. Why was he never properly taught how to box? On paper, he's got a lot going for him -- big power, long reach, natural athleticism, gym rat, etc. With some solid fundamentals, he really could have been something special.
     
  4. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    1,485
    2,305
    Jun 28, 2005
    He got into fighting late, has tons of natural power and won a lot of fights despite sloppy mechanics.

    Sometimes the worst and best thing to happen to a fighter is to discover that they have worldie power - short cuts their education.
     
  5. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,876
    Oct 8, 2013
    You can only face the best of your era- Marciano did that, as champion. Legacy wise he’s near the top. H2H he’s so small and did not have any big heavies to fight so it’s questionable how far his abilities would translate as the division grew bigger.
     
  6. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,077
    20,564
    Jul 30, 2014
    Name me one credible poster who says Marciano wasn’t “elite” nor an ATG.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,131
    25,312
    Jan 3, 2007
    They can’t. The only arguments we ever seem to hear from such people are how he’d fail in a different era which are :

    A. Irrelevant

    and

    B. Unprovable

    Weather he fought in a week era or not he still established himself as the best of that period and in so doing set a heavyweight record that 70 years later remains unbroken
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,112
    Jun 2, 2006
    Razor Ruddock?
     
    Fergy, Bokaj, Reinhardt and 1 other person like this.
  9. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    1,485
    2,305
    Jun 28, 2005
    Ruddock, Foreman, Wilder - Naseem somewhat, arguably Tua.
     
  10. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,507
    32,231
    Jan 14, 2022
    No one argues he wasn't a great fighter in his day the issue is nostalgic fans severly over estimate his H2H ability against bigger elite Heavyweights.

    And if I'm being honest yes Marciano deserves to be a top 10 Heavyweight in the all time Heavyweight rankings but in regards to his H2H ability he wouldn't even be in my top 20.
     
  11. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,049
    8,105
    Jun 10, 2024
    Hamed is a good comparison IMO - they both showed flashes of boxing skill earlier in their careers, then seemed to get caught up in their "Bomb Skwadz" personas.
     
    META5 likes this.
  12. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,984
    19,025
    Oct 4, 2016


    This is absolutely correct,,,,,If we're brutally honest I seriously doubt Rocky sees round 5 against David Tua....
     
    Dynamicpuncher likes this.
  13. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,280
    11,729
    Sep 21, 2017
    Why?
     
  14. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,496
    7,262
    May 18, 2006
    What the **** does that have to do with anything?
    @mr magoo addressed this very line of irrelevant thinking that people constantly use to disparage Marciano’s quality as a fighter.
     
  15. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,744
    4,165
    Jan 6, 2024
    Its because he was a small slugger in the smallest HW era. And there is nothing from his career that puts his chances against the greats of other eras in a favorable light. He had his hands full in the most favorable conditions.

    The point fighter version of Louis was his biggest opponent it took him awhile to put Louis down. He had power but theres nothing to suggest it would translate against bigger opponents like a Fitzsimmons, Langford, Tyson. Even some LHWs like Qawi. Meanwhile Moore and Walcott were able to put Marciano down and its hard to imagine him lasting against many top HWs north of 200 pounds. If Louis was 5 years older but still had the power from his prime I feel like he would have been able to defeat prime Marciano.

    Now you can say none of what I wrote above applies to his era. And thats true. But in his own era he could have fought tougher and especially larger opponents. Theres Clarence Henry, Bob Baker, Valdes, Holman, Parker etc etc. Marcianos era was small but there were some big fighters and HW had an awful lot of depth and its part of why I hold fighting Walcott and Charles 4x against him because he kind of screwed over a great many people. It wasn't just Charles and Walcott, LaStarza was a rematch and if LaStarza had lost to Rex Layne he'd have fought Rex Layne in another rematch. The 1950s HW division has the most top guys no one has ever heard of and Marciano has some blame for that. Thats not all on him its also on the IBC but if you're wondering why everyone isn't giving Marciano his flowers for dominating his era thats why.

    Say what you want about Moores title claims he won them against the 2 biggest HWs in the division. And while he lost to Rocky he did a public campaign to get that fight. Before that Marcianos resume of Savold, Buonvino, Bernie Reynolds, Matthews, Walcottx2, LaStarza, Charlesx2, Cockell is probably the easiest 10 fight run someone in Marcianos position could have had. Now individually these are fine fighters but if you put them together as a group that is not a great run.

    None of this is to say Marciano wasn't elite. Everyone could agree that at minimum he was a top 4 or 5 HW when he was champ in a loaded era. But he retired 49-0 and the exclusive nature of that feat implys a lot more than him being elite.