The only way is to make the ****ers more accountable which won't happen or fight till someone gets KO'd or can't continue which also won't happen.
It's not always subjective though. Williams/Lara wasn't a case of opinion. Williams got the decision purely because he was the name fighter on that bill. Lara was just the opponent and got robbed like a lot of others have. Lucas Matthyse was clearly robbed the other week because it was the Devon Alexander show. Sometimes there are close fights that could go either way or it's just purely a random coincidence that one judge sees it widely different to another. Most of the time, it's simple corruption. And that won't be wiped out unless every single fight is sanctioned by one true governing body, who only have the best interests of the sport of boxing in mind. But I've got about as much chance of winning that Euromillions tonight (and I ain't even bought a ticket)
http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/williams-lara-judges-suspended-89656 Some of you will be pleased to know that.
The commission found no evidence of corruption, etc, just incompetence. But they also can't overturn the decision or mandate a rematch. So what good does that do? The judges may not be Williams' fault, but it's laughable that such inexperienced jusges managed to turn in scores that basically ignored the core principles of good boxing. Lara kicked Williams' ass. No doubts about it, he deserved the win.
Boxing is more a business than a sport and as a result those with the power don't want regulations getting in the way of their money making.
One idea i had was the Judges having a supreme arbitor who watches the fight without sound and who must be anonymous and who will then check the judges cards, anything way out gets knocked and the arbitors scorecard will take its place and as someone has pointed those judges doing daft scoring get knocked down the ladder as to scoring for big fights.