How can Floyd be regarded #1 at 147 (some claim he is P4P) if he has not fought ...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PJ, Dec 19, 2007.


  1. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    :patsch lineage doesnt come from Ring magazine
     
  2. JAM Killer

    JAM Killer Coming Through. Full Member

    1,274
    0
    Nov 5, 2006
    Linear champion, and by all means he is the undisputed champ, since Cory Spinks unified, then Zab beat him, then Baldomir and Floyd beat the last two undisputed champions, so how could he not be number 1?
     
  3. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Thats what I just said desperado.
     
  4. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Undisputed does not mean linear desperado. :p
     
  5. JAM Killer

    JAM Killer Coming Through. Full Member

    1,274
    0
    Nov 5, 2006
    I didn't say it did king ****! I am saying that it is seperate, and that Floyd is both.
     
  6. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Well go on and explain his linealness then your highness.:p
     
  7. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007


    :good
     
  8. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Then where are you getting Floyd's linealness?

    Cat got your toungs?
     
  9. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Floydian slips or False hopes?
     
  10. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007

    http://cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/welter.htm


    had to dig that up.....it stops at 2003 with spinks...zab beat spinks....baldomir beat zab...pbf beat baldomir.....
     
  11. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Um excuse me but your Floydian slippin again just as Sugarandgold and jamkiller did because you have just regressed to the Ring linealism which is not true linealism cause sugar never beat Trinny.
     
  12. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
  13. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007

    shane shouldnt have been considered lineal after beating dlh....but lineal starts over when the titles are unified....i believe mayorga unified the wba with forrest's wbc belt...then spinks unified those with his ibf belt....then thats where the zab beat spinks baldomir beat zab and pbf beat baldomir comes into play
     
  14. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    I know what your saying and it is probably closer to lineal than the other Ring picks but still I think that I would have returned it to Whitiker (who was robbed against La Hoya) after Trinny moved up. I cant remember who the other top welters of the time were.
     
  15. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007


    yea i think whitaker was robbed also but i can only go by what the decisions actually were....and whitaker most likely would have retired lineal champ...but then the lineage gets started over when the titles are unified