Yeah Floyd was coming forward though the fight (More exciting) and that DONT need a lot of footwork. he wanted to please the viewers, not be so evasive and make it a boring fight, like sometimes he does. then Freddie claims his legs are gone, No Floyd Just wanted to make it a more entertaining fight. he didnt want to move around/run (more use of Footwork).
Floyd is definately not the same fighter he was 5 years ago, but I will still favor him to beat Pacquiao clearly.
as sportsmen pac and floyd should stop all the BS and get this fight on, to end any debate of who is best. and for boxing fans most people would miss there wedding day for this fight.:deal
If his legs where gone he would of got dropped by the Mosley shot, it anythings his legs are better than we all knew
Because Roach has his salesman hat on. He won't train Pacquiao for a standstill, 'no legs' Mayweather, GUARANTEED.
LMFAO..CUZ HE A HATER....ITS A LOSE LOSE FOR FLOYD... IF HE BOXES ON HIS BACK FOOT HE IS A "RUNNER" IF HE BOXES ON HIS FRONT FOOT "HIS LEGS ARE GONE".. LMFAO....HE GETS HIT FLUSH AND HE GOTTA GLASS CHIN...I BET IF HE BEATS MANNY HE WONT GET ALOT OF CREDIT AS MANNY IS "TOO SMALL"atsch
When Manny laid on the ropes against Cotto: Manny/Freddie claimed he wanted to prove Cotto wasn't the bigger and stronger man When Floyd walks down Mosley: Freddie claims he doesn't have the legs to run away anymore Why anyone takes what Freddie says seriously is beyond me
I don't think Floyd's legs have gone. I think they just thought that by taking command of the center of the ring it would be a better game plan than fighting on the back foot against Mosley. Didn't Roger Mayweather say in one of the 24/7 shows that Floyd would be holding his ground in the middle of the ring anyway?
