How can Froch be considered better than Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tenorio, Jun 1, 2014.


Page 4 of 4
  1. Bubba

    Bubba Boxing’s not as popular as it used to be, right? Full Member

    2,415
    326
    Jul 19, 2004
    Froch has a better resume.

    Also Froch fights anyone.
     
    Bubba, Jun 1, 2014
    Bubba, Jun 1, 2014
    #46
  2. Bubba

    Bubba Boxing’s not as popular as it used to be, right? Full Member

    2,415
    326
    Jul 19, 2004

    :good
     
    Bubba, Jun 1, 2014
    Bubba, Jun 1, 2014
    #47
  3. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    He can't be. He's not a better fighter, it's that simple.

    His fans can drone on about warrior this, and resume that but the facts are he lost to a faded Kessler, was badly outclassed by Ward and Dirrell and needed two fights to convincingly beat Groves, who while very talented and with time and improvements could well be a future world champion, would be dealt with quite handily by most top class supermiddles at this stage of his career.
     
    loughlan, Jun 1, 2014
    loughlan, Jun 1, 2014
    #48
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Calzaghe is far superior to Froch or Ward. Ward is a damned chicken, he will only fight in his home town, with his personal referee, judges and boxing commission, he won't fight anywhere else......................Stevenson brought out the fear in Ward, Ward refused to fight him at 168. Ward is a cheat..............
     
    Farmboxer, Jun 1, 2014
    Farmboxer, Jun 1, 2014
    #49
Page 4 of 4