How can Froch say Golovkin's opposition is weak?

...

Froch has a far far better resume than Golovkin and it isn't even close

Froch's win over Dirrell is better than any name Golovkin has, actually it's probably better than his entire resume. That win alone!!!

 

Shame he should have lost that fight- Dirrell clearly won imo.

Though Froch has the far better resume, I agree.

LOL at claiming the Glen Johnson fight was a robbery

 

Froch's first title fight win over Pascal is better than any single win of Golovkin's career. Their resumes are simply not comparable.

 

Froch's resume is much better, with or without dirrell. Golovkin already beat dirrell btw

 

Might have been true IF he had a clear victory there.

I don't think the Dirrell win was a robbery, but the fight could easily have been judged either way.

Golovkin has no such results on his resume. All his major bouts have been decided by KO.

At this point, a small case can be made for Froch being greater, given that Kessler and Ward are both a step above GGG's competition, but it appears to be just a matter of time till GGG moves clearly ahead of him.

In fact, a bout between the pair of them would probably settle matters.

 

What did Kessler do other than beating Froch? It seems like as time passes wins are made out to be better than they are. Kessler is a good fighter, but his key win is.. beating Froch. In the larger sceheme of things, the opposition is similar. Golovkin just makes it look a lot easier.

The only SMW with a clearly better resume is Ward, because he beat both Froch and Kessler... and even then the only real leg up is the Froch win as Froch resume is more or less equivalent to GGG and Kesslers value lies largely in beating Froch.

If Froch cant get Chavez in the ring, he ought just face GGG and settle matters. Theres a really easy way to find out who the better fighter is, a pity its not used more often.

 

froch is trying to save face after he admitted being scared of golovkin I am a fan of froch but he would get knocked out by ggg

 

are you stupid? Nevermind, I've seen your other threads. You're very stupid

 

Froch has the right to speak his mind .

If he say Golovkins opposition is weak , then so be it .

 

Man, Froch has fought and beaten several future HoF'ers, it isn't strange if he thinks Golovkin has had an easy ride so far. Wish there were a few more fighters like Froch around.

 

Like who ?

Kessler ?

Mikel is the best name that Carl has beaten and he has also lost to him, splitting their series at 1-1.


And Mikkel is faaaar from certain as a HoFer, he's a maybe.

Apart from that one 'maybe', he has beaten no HoFers.

 

Golovkin has 2 victories (Geale, Macklin) that would be among Froch's 7 or 8 best victories (Kessler II, Bute, Pascal, Abraham, Taylor, Johnson, Groves II, Dirrell). The gap between Froch's top 4 wins and Golovkins' 2 best is massive, and I'm a huge Geale fan.

 

Because compared to his, it has been.

 

froch is scared