How can Holmes-Norton be considered very close?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sportofkings, May 15, 2011.


  1. sportofkings

    sportofkings Boxing Junkie banned

    12,368
    23
    Jul 21, 2010
    I just rewatched and scored the Holmes-Norton fight today. I admit its only my second time watching it, but i remember a much closer fight the first time i watched it. Larry built up a huge lead in the beginning of the fight and took most of the rounds. Norton staged a comeback later on but he was trying to overcome a massive deficit in points imo ( in spite of what the judges scored it). I can see how this fight ended up being a razor thin split decision, by as close a margin as you could get. The judges were dead wrong imo. Larry won clearly with his boxing skills and jab. It comes across to me as a competitive fight, but not nearly as close as ive heard some people say. But overall it sone of the best heavyweight fights you could ever see. Btw here is my scorecard for the fight.

    Round 1: 10-9 Norton ( close round, but i have it to Norton because of the bigger punches he landed)
    Round 2: 10-9 Holmes
    Round 3: 10-9 Holmes
    Round 4: 10-9 Holmes
    Round 5: 10-9 Holmes
    Round 6: 10-9 Holmes
    Round 7: 10-9 Holmes
    Round 8: 10-9 Norton
    Round 9: 10-9 Holmes (close round but i feel Holmes did enough)
    Round 10: 10-9 Holmes
    Round 11: 10-9 Norton
    Round 12: 10-9 Norton
    Round 13: 10-8 Holmes (Holmes looked to have Norton going in this round)
    Round 14: 10-9 Norton
    Round 15: 10-9 Norton ( Could also be scored 10-8 for Norton but Larry was laways throwing back )

    So Overall I scored it 144-140 for Holmes. How did you scored it?
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Have not scored this one in a while, but I did a few years ago. I had Holmes up 2-3 rounds. A close, but clear decision for Holmes.
     
  3. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    I don't remember my scorecard, but it was a razor close Holmes victory.

    I wonder if Holmes would've lost to Peak Norton?
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,576
    Nov 24, 2005
    I don't think so.
    I believe Holmes was genuinely injured for the Norton fight too.
     
  5. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Sorry i forgot about his bad shoulder.
     
  6. sportofkings

    sportofkings Boxing Junkie banned

    12,368
    23
    Jul 21, 2010
    I think Holmes really outworked Norton in most rounds, its just that Norton would land the occasional big right hand or left hook. I think i was being slightly generous to Norton in my scoring aswell. The first round could have gone to Holmes.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,576
    Nov 24, 2005
    :good
    Yeah, I think it more than evens up Norton's slight past-primeness.

    Still, Norton was a hard man to beat for anyone unless they possess dynamite punching power.
     
  8. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    The whole controversy about the outcome of the scoring was contrived by Howard Cosell and ABC, who centered post fight coverage on the fact the judges somehow had it even after 14 rounds. Then, they rebroadcast only the last round and asked, "Did Holmes really win those final three minutes?"

    Not one single person I was with in the large group who watched it live (at a big high school graduation party) believed Norton had the slightest chance to win going into that final round sans knockout, and every single one of us was rooting for Ken. Like Duran in Montreal, Larry should have had this one sewn up on the cards after ten. The real controversy is how the hell these judges could possibly have it even after 14 rounds, and I suspect the answer lies in the overwhelming pressure to project Norton as a viable alternative titlist to Leon Spinks after Ken was awarded the WBC belt in a smoke filled room.

    As was the case in Montreal, the closeness of the final score was very misleading. And if you think the scoring was still somehow controversial, imagine the stink if Ken had somehow been awarded the decision.

    Peak for peak, I think a Holmes unhampered by serious injury would outbox the Norton of Ali I & II and Jerry Quarry conclusively enough to secure a clear UD. In their second bout, Ali similarly swept the first several rounds from Ken, and Muhammad may not have been quite as good then as Larry was in Shavers I. (If the uninjured Holmes of Shavers I had shown up for Norton, nobody would be discussing who the rightful winner of Holmes-Norton was.)
     
  9. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    31
    Mar 10, 2007
    larry was fighting with one arm for this fight
     
  10. sportofkings

    sportofkings Boxing Junkie banned

    12,368
    23
    Jul 21, 2010
    I agree with this, I dont think Norton deserved to receive the title, if anyone deserved the courtesy of a rematch with Spinks, it was a legend like Ali:good Spinks shouldnt have been stripped for that.
     
  11. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    Absolutely. Ali was a globetrotting world champion, the most famous man in the world, and a heavyweight titleholder who had generated ten successful defenses in his second reign. He deserved an opportunity to regain the crown.

    Ken did not make the most of his 1976 shot at Ali, while Leon dethroned him with balls to the wall abandon. The honorable thing was clearly to grant a return to a great deposed champion.

    Is there a snowball's chance in hell that Norton ever could have produced as many as ten successful heavyweight defenses at any time in his career? Ali's final successful defense was against an opponent who crushes Ken in one round anytime they square off. In October 1980, Leon legitimately qualified for his shot at Holmes by stopping the huge and deadly Bernardo Mercado in nine, showing he could be a far better heavyweight than he's remembered as today. Does Ken ever avoid being knocked out by Mercado, let alone actually win?

    Well, in any event, there doesn't appear to be much controversy about who deserved to win Holmes-Norton among the knowledgeable posters here in Classic, or among those who have taken the time to view the entirety of their bout when it's been available on youtube, as you have viewed and scored it.
     
  12. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,152
    Aug 26, 2004
    I thought Holmes won it in the last rd. and may have been ahead going into the last rd but the fight was close a roller-coaster fight and it depends on what you look for or favor in fight more punches or the power shots...Jabs or hard head and body shots. It was a fight that certainly deserved a rematch.

    By the way it was one of my favorite Holmes fight and a fight that made me take notice of his will to win
     
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,553
    Jul 28, 2004
    Holmes-Norton was a cliff-hanger!!! One of the very best heavyweight bouts, or for that matter of any weight..I believed that Holmes took it it that last round alone.
     
  14. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    my score of Larry-Kenny was 8-7 for Larry

    V.close fight
     
  15. Bonavena25

    Bonavena25 Vamos! Full Member

    4,778
    1
    Nov 2, 2007
    Not sure how true that is. The doctor told him that at the start it would be almost 100% and only if it got injured during the fight would it start to really hamper him again. Holmes never really expanded on how his arm held up that night (at least to my knowledge), so he may have been relatively untroubled.