How can Klitshcko's NOT be in the top 3 P4P?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bad Dog, Sep 28, 2010.


  1. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    oh okay, so do you automatically assume that people dont like them because of their origin? do you ever consider for one minute that maybe we just dont like their fighting styles?? some of my current favorite fighters today are korobov, golovkin, bute, mitchell, cleverly, katsidis, and boytsov. all of them european, and what do you know! all of them white!! and why is that?? they're exciting as hell to watch, in all honesty i'd rather watch paint dry then watch the klits beat an overmatched opponent in dull fashion. i mean are you really gonna tell me that vitali-johnson and vitali-sosnowski was a barnburner? or any of wlads latest fights? even as a klitschko fan you've gotta admit those fights were complete snooze-fests
     
  2. tbp82

    tbp82 Active Member Full Member

    959
    0
    Oct 29, 2009

    First off who here who citicizes the K2 brothers don't give them any credit we all acknowledge their dominance just because we realize it is a weak division give or take the few guys the K2 brothers haven't fought yet does not mean we aren't giving them credit for what they have accomplished. Another thing that hurts them is we always talk about them as one. David Haye needs to fight a Klitscho. They cleaned out the division. I think if Tyson, Louis, Ali, or any other ATG had a brother who helped them clean out a weak division (again save maybe 3 or 4 guys K2 haven't faced yet) then it would hurt their legacy as well.
     
  3. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    :deal
     
  4. MTB79

    MTB79 Active Member Full Member

    775
    35
    Dec 7, 2008

    This content is protected
     
  5. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    Like when Tyson was knocking fat bums out?
     
  6. jasonbourne

    jasonbourne Who's Next? Full Member

    130
    0
    Mar 7, 2010
    I think they not labled p4p because its an abstract concept of how they would do in every divison hypothetically. With that being said their fighting styles would not hold up in other divisions. Just my thought on y they are not considered p4p.
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    P4P is a measure of boxing ability devided by weight.

    Boxing ability is a measure of speed, power, technical skills, offense, defense, stamina, punch resistance, reach, height, accuracy, and everything else that allows a boxer to win boxing matches.

    The Klitschko's are pretty high up there, but better than Pac or Floyd? no way.
     
  8. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Ridiculous ! :lol: :rofl
     
  9. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    1. Pac
    2. Floyd
    3. Wlad

    I agree :good
     
  10. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    What? You weren't impressed when Tyson knocked out the great Peter McNeely? :rofl
     
  11. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I'm going to go out on a limb here & guess you're black Hendo, guess a guess of course :yep :lol:
     
  12. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    Apart from McNeely, of course!:yep
     
  13. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Tyson fought 2 drawn out fights against Razor Ruddock, and he won both, but compare that to the absolute domination by Lennox Lewis who KO'd Razor in 2 rounds.
     
  14. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
  15. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Ridiculous.