HOW can PARKER beat ZHANG? - Your Tactics??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kiwi_in_America, Jan 28, 2024.


  1. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council banned Full Member

    27,342
    10,122
    May 29, 2007
    Never said he was but the ones he threw. And landed caused damage!
     
  2. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,753
    81,057
    Aug 21, 2012
    Thanke man. The comic angle is always appreciated.
     
    zulander and Kiwi_in_America like this.
  3. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,512
    3,311
    Oct 19, 2006
    I too always appreciate humor when I see it
     
    Mark Anthony and BCS8 like this.
  4. KINGWILDER

    KINGWILDER Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,789
    2,598
    May 11, 2023
    Where did I say he was? Parker effectively utilised distance through much of the fight, outlanders Zhang, showed much better defence and movement, and had considerably better fight management.
     
    BCS8 and Mark Anthony like this.
  5. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,739
    3,611
    May 17, 2023
    Only a few times, that`s not nearly enough.
     
  6. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,512
    3,311
    Oct 19, 2006
    Another great win by Parker

    A man reborn!
     
    Perkin Warbeck, KINGWILDER and BCS8 like this.
  7. KINGWILDER

    KINGWILDER Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,789
    2,598
    May 11, 2023
    Parker is a blessing to the heavyweight division. I’m enjoying how butthurt he’s made the Zhang and Wilder fanboys - guys just can’t take an L these days.
     
  8. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,512
    3,311
    Oct 19, 2006
    He's in his prime and finally fulfilling

    his long-awaited potential
     
  9. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,512
    3,311
    Oct 19, 2006
    I also have hope he has worked out Zhang a little -

    and may beat him soundly next time without getting knocked down!!
     
  10. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,739
    3,611
    May 17, 2023
    Parker won by being negative, he always only fights in spurts.
     
  11. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    If Parker was negative, what was Zhang as he threw even less than Parker.

    Parker used to fight in spurts because he would get countered as when he attacked he used to put very little thought into what and why he was throwing. He still fights in spurts that's true but now he's actually selective with what he throws and mixes in a lot of feints between those spurts to shut his opponents offence down and keep them guessing as to what he is doing. Is it exciting, perhaps not, but it's proven to be effective in his last 2 fights.
     
  12. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,739
    3,611
    May 17, 2023
    Parker didn`t land enough and neither did Zhang, I was not impressed.
     
  13. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,512
    3,311
    Oct 19, 2006
    He has negated and beaten the 2 hardest punchers in the division

    And you are not impressed?
     
  14. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,739
    3,611
    May 17, 2023
    Wilder needs to retire, both those fights were pretty dull and lacklustre, Parker is a good spoiler, he`s too negative and doesn`t land enough shots, he`s a safety first fighter.
     
  15. edabomb

    edabomb Active Member Full Member

    984
    961
    Jul 2, 2011
    Parker briefly wobbled Zhang in the 4th. That is where the fight changed, Parker showed an ability to hurt Zhang where Joyce's glacial slow attacks couldn't deter Zhang at all.

    While Zhang spent the night shaking his head at clean shots the proof was in how much he was flinching at feints through the back half of the fight. He was also well marked up by the end.