How can people debate who has the best resume????

This system has a lot of flaws, and is very subjective. You are fooling yourself if you think it's not.

 

How the bar is set too low now for HOF criteria. So Corrales and Castillo are HOF's now? Why? Did they have the consistency and longetivity? The resume? Good grief!

 

Nothing in Floyd's resume could ever match the Pacquiao win over MAB. And there is no debate that MAB was prime at that time.

 

I find it funny quatifying their wins. Well figure this. Of all FMJ's wins, only DLH is a certified ATG and HOF. Pac has 3, DLH, MAB and EM. How do you quantify that? And how about that dominating performances? Out of 8 fights with certified ATG's, 5 was dominant wins, two close fight and 1 loss.

Floyd with his 1 fight against a certified ATG got a measly SD. His most dominant display, is against Corrales who is borderline HOF. How do you quatify that?

 

You consider Sasakul as "B" level win? Sasakul and Ledwaba at one time were considered the best 112 and 122 pounders. None of Floyds "B" level wins were the top dog when the fight was made in their respective weight classes.

You gloat over his first 135 fight as title fight, yet conveniently forgot to say that at 122, it was Pacs first fight and on 2 weeks notice. Huh? And that point, Sasakul was considered the # 112, lineal, while Ledwaba was #2 at 122 and at top 15 P4P list. Noone at floyd's "B" level wins has attains such status.

 

Poster with that resume ratings system. Your ratings suck.

Mayweather beating a shot Sharmba Mitchell (and at 147) is the same rating as Pac beating Hatton at 140 (where he was still unbeaten and dominant)?

And you have Zab Judah as an A- win for Floyd (when Zab had just lost to Baldo)?

Clearly biased towards Floyd. Absolute joke.

 

I agree. I'm just ****ing with you guys. Pac's got the better resume.

 

Yeah beating up on damaged +140 pounders.