How can people say Golovkin is a hype job, but Broner isn't?

GGG's amateur record speaks for itself. Anyone who claims amateur experience means nothing in pro's is ******ed. Some amateurs have a natural style for the pro's and some don't. GGG's always had a good style, and has tweaked what's he's needed to accordingly as well.

Also, some fools like iceman want to bring up the Rosado fight. Try watching it again and noticing how Rosado is trying his best to survive, barely throwing anything but a jab in between his running for nearly every round. GGG was still able to cut the ring off successfully to get the TKO win.

 

People will start call Stevens as a hype job without one knockout punch or low lewel boxer. But this "low level" boxer can possibly destroy Quillin. And then Quillin will become a hype job. And then possibly Martinez and so on. But Martinez can give GGG challenge no doubt

 

I always hear people say that Broner is a hype job but somehow Golovkin is the proven real deal.

 

If Broner picks up a decisive W over Maidana in December than I think he'd quite clearly have a better resume than Golovkin.

Even as it stands now...

DeMarco (135), Malignaggi (147), Ponce de Leon (130)

are greater opponents faced than:

Macklin (160), Rosado (160), Proksa (160)

 

While I agree largely regarding DeMarco, you can't ignore that almost everyone rated him as the #1 Lightweight. Was it perhaps the weakest moment in time in the divisions' history? I think it very well may have been, but it is what it is. DeMarco IS a level above Rico Ramos, for the record.

---

If you do the A vs. B vs. C triangle theory, which is beyond foolish in boxing, than I could say a whole bunch of **** to support my argument too.

Like:

Golovkin's win over Ouma isn't as good as the 5 men who beat Ouma in the 7 fights leading up to the Golovkin vs. Ouma showdown.

Alfredo Angulo blasted out Gabe Rosado in less than one third of the time it took for Golovkin to do so.

Ishida had lost 24 straight rounds leading into his fight with Golovkin, including the fight before in his de facto MW debut against Pirog. Ishida didn't get better after those 12 rounds and the 10 month layoff that followed.

Golovkin only did what Sergio and Jamie Moore had done to Macklin before.

Curtis Stevens at one time got dropped and stopped by Mr. 19-15 Marcos Primera in shorter time than Golovkin managed to dispatch him. Jesse Brinkley beat his ass almost 4 years before Golovkin fought him, and in that span Stevens had only gained stock from a mere 4 fights against very, very unranked opponents... Boxrec at its finest, baby...

 

Is that your opinion of what you feel their talent level is?

Or is that in regards to resume? Because if it is, Broner is ahead of Brook and it isn't even close to being close.