How can u rank Floyd higher all-time p4p when Pac has better resume & achievements?

You can't.

Pac is bordering top 20 material. Floyd is top 50. It isn't close.

 

Not post things that are completely irrelevant. There are a lot of examples throughout these 12 pages of that from both of you.

It's been happening since this argument started, and these recent posts have just gotten worse. It quickly turned from an actual debate to a little kid's fight, on both sides.

 

This is why im willing to trade daft insults with the little ***** all day.

I have never said that. My first post on this very thread points to that fact. My surprise as to how he can wipe out any other determining factors when placing fighters on a Top 100 list bar resume and weight jumping, flew in the face of what he so stoutly defended when he submited the list months ago.

I brought up Oscar and Floyd as an example of such argument that he faced, How Oscar had a better resume but Floyd was rated higher by DINA and then suddenly it was HIM that asked me about Oscar and Floyd??. WTF??. And i said that in the first few pages, and i wasnt going on about watertight,atsch,fail or any other bull****, i was asking a ****in question, and the little ****stick has the cheek to turn round and say it was ME who was looking for a row.


I asked because during that time when he printed that list he was bombarded with questions about "How can you have Roy ahead of Hop, or Lopez above Calzaghe if it's about resumes(Amongst others, bump the ****in thread). And he stated that there were other factors to consider, like performance at the weight, H2H against other ATG at the weight, skillset, KO's etc.., and i agreed with the little ****er.

Then he makes a cluster **** of a thread about Pac and Floyd. And while i agree that Pac is ahead of him, within 10 posts he is completley ruling out any other factor besides Resume and weight jumping???.

I wanted to know why?. Thats all. Where did skillset,H2H and the rest of the pish he spouted a few months ago dissapear too? Simple question.


You will never find a post where i rate Hop over Roy ATG standing, that was bull**** spewed out after he realised his contradiction then there was trawling of my history and asking me to answer my own question. Just stupid.

 

Man caught out , act like *****.

JuJu-20-09

 

:smooch

 

Im curious has to how the **** this point system works?! :huh

But I'll just look at the grading system.
Zab Judah, DeLaHoya, and Hatton an "A- level" win?! :rofl:nut NO NO NO! :nono

Hatton may have been undefeated, but he was at a weight class that he was absolute **** in. Manny fought him at his best weight class AND with his new "training" under Mayweather Sr. You're going to have to either switch Manny's win to A- or move May's down. Either way their slightly even with Manny's being better because of the destructive manner in which he did it in.

Manny's win over Morales was in the II and III...not I. And again...how the **** is DeLaHoya an "A- level" win and Manny's "B Level"?:huh Although Floyd moved up a weight class and didnt have a weight-drained version of Oscar...his rusty skillset was the same and won by SPLIT DECISION :-(. Manny moved up 3 WEIGHT CLASSES (two if you want to be technical) AND MADE HIM QUIT, whilst making him look ****in' AWFUL. You can blame the weight drain all day, but the simple fact is that Manny hit him and got the **** out of the way, while Mayweather, out of his own volition, chose to stay on the ropes and do his shoulder rolls and try to counter. Mayweather was also not as big of an underdog as Manny was at the time of the fight. They need to be placed either in the same light, or Floyd's win needs to be downgraded.

Mitchell and Manfreddy B LEVEL WINS?! atsch That's B- material...

this bull**** mathematical critique is horse ****...Im done :bart

EDIT: as a matter of fact...most of the names in the B level list should be downgraded to B- and the B- list needs to be removed with the exception of Gatti

 

Just cant stand hypocrisy bud.

1 simple question gets abuse.