How can u rank Floyd higher all-time p4p when Pac has better resume & achievements?

I don't consider 'multi-titlist' an important marker on the ATG list. I feel it's unfair to penalise HW's for beind too big by default since they can never be multi-weight champions unless they start lower.

Pac ranks higher by a good 5-10 placing imo.

 

Ive seen your Top 100 where would floyd rank if he added JMM,Pac and Shane?

 

Sounds about right.

 

I agree

 

I am aware of that numbnuts. Do you rank Calzaghe over Hopkins?. Dont get smart, it doesnt suit you. I'll put it in laymens terms.

Hop's resume ****'s on Roy's, just like Hop's ****'s on Calzaghe's. He lost both. Yet you rank Roy above both of them. If your P4P list is soley based on resume and weight jumping as you claim in this thread and not H2H ability or skillset, which you claimed were vital in other threads, how can rating Floyd above Pac be impossible?

Or does that criteria just not suit your argument this time so you have to narrow it down to just resume and weight jumping?

 

Indeed, Quietly Floyd was pissin me off with his "retirement", he has an opportunity to so many great things.

 

It will change by the end of the year after PBF beats Manny and JMM:deal

 

:deal

 

I feel ya. I know he needed some time off to rest his hands and pursue other things but he wasted some time he should have come back at the beginning of the year.

 

Here is a thing, to determine the level of a fighter you must look subjectivly at their skillset. To determine the level of fighter that they have beaten, otherwise how do you determine the value of a win?