How can u rank Floyd higher all-time p4p when Pac has better resume & achievements?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, May 4, 2009.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I have noticed that you seem to be a good one for sitting on the fence, taking no strong standpoint, then popping up and moaning like a ***** at those of us who stand up for their opinions, so let's examine you for a change.

    You say you rank Hopkins above Jones because he has a better resume, in spite of the fact Jones won titles in more weight divisions and beat Hopkins when they fought, and was the first mw in a century to win a hw title, and was in the opinion of most a superior fighter when at his peak.

    So by the same criteria, you rank Oscar higher than Floyd in all-time pound-for-pound terms.

    Yes?
     
  2. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    What is it with this "he beat so and so better than this guy. Foreman beat Frazier and Norton better than Ali did, and Ali beat Foreman lol. You did see how Hatton looked in the Lazcano fight? I've given Pac credit for his win over Hatton. Paulie couldn't punch, and he was tailor made for Hatton. Both Pac and Floyd rattled Hatton's brain. You probably caught a post I wrote where a guy dissed Floyd, and I retaliated against Pac. This is fun to do just in case you don't think it is...no disrespect to you or Pac.
     
  3. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    I think so. Judah had almost the same speed of Mayweather and was just undisputed WW champ. Hatton was the lineal champ but Pacquiao was a heavy fav, still a good win though
     
  4. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    I've spelled analyze on here 100 times. You read what I wrote incorrectly lol...and you missed my point!
     
  5. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    They are based on dominance, not weight-jumping. Hopkins was #1 at middleweight. Explanation: He dominated the division for several years. The P4P list is opinionated anyway. Why people make such a huge deal of it is beyond me. As far as Pacquiao having a better resume is crazy. The biggest names on his resume are De la Hoya, Barrera, Marquez, Morales, and Hatton. Let's be honest here, all of them were shot except for Marquez.(who also gave Pac the hardest time) Marquez was the only fighter I truly give high marks for. Barrera....well past his prime. Morales....past his prime and still beat Pac in their first fight. DelaHoya....oh please, dead man walking. Hatton could have been a good matgh-up if he had any kind of brains. He was finished after Floyd took his confidence. Manny put the smackdown on him just like he should have.(great job)He had the perfect style to beat Hatton;hard punching quick southpaw. Mayweather blew out an undefeated Corrales,who was avoided by Barrera, and Morales. Trashed Gatti who for some reason people thought had a chance because of his new defense which didn't show up against Floyd. Beat a very well trained Judah who was bananas in training for that fight. Castillo who was at the time a very hard puncher in the division.(twice,and once with an injured hand). Beat an Oscar that wasn't weight drained at 154 where Floyd had never fought. Clowned an undefeated Hatton and snatched his pride in the process. Mayweather fought bigger, stronger guys before they were shot. The names mean nothing if they were not at their best. Would you rank Trevor Berbick or Leon Spinks above Ali. Of course not. Be reasonable.
     
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Nope, check back to the last page. You wrote 'analization', so either you can't spell or it was a Freudian slip and your boyfriend's a-hole was on your mind...
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    :lol: There's no way that's a serious comment. I'm not taking the bait.
     
  8. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Blah blah blah.

    You said Hatton was damaged goods. I say he looked as good as ever in beating Malignaggi. Do you think he looked damaged against Malignaggi?

    (was Judah damaged when he fought Mayweather? He had just lost to the great ****ing BALDOMIR after all!)
     
  9. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    You know, I tried to like keep it civil with you, and I guess you are becoming the degenerate that you always were because this thought above shows some kind of sick, immature complex that you have in life...and all because we are arguing about Pac and Floyd. You haven't changed, and you are truly phony to me, and to a lot of other posters.
     
  10. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    As of right now I honestly would rank Pac-man higher. Simply because I like him and he is on fire. He has proven that he is the most exciting fighter with the absence of Mayweather. Good luck to the Pac-man on his way to greatness. The best fighter from the far east ever.:good
     
  11. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    I think he looked damaged against Paulie. He was still making the same mistakes as always. He was in with a guy for 1: who can't punch.for 2:was scared to punch. Dude, I would have stopped Paulie that night.:yep
     
  12. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    This is where you quoted me as saying Hatton was damaged goods.

    When Pac caught Barrera and Morales, they both had started boxing when they were 15, and had miles on their fightometer before they fought Pac. They were names when PAc beat them, and you can tell by how they fought Pac back. With the exception of the first Morales fight, Pac dominated both guys. Pac has not clearly beaten Marquez either. Dlh was weight weakened, and the Hatton win was impressive, but even posters say Hatton was damaged goods.

    You say Hatton looked good as ever in that Paulie fight lol, because you don't know boxing. You also told me Dlh would be too big for your hero, and I had to tell your ****** as that he wasn't phony.
     
  13. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    He can't judge fighters Jai. He is a stat pusher. He can't be objective. He even tried to post my misspelling. My word is bond he does not want to go there lol. You don't want to go there Dinamita lol. Please, stay away from that lol...
     
  14. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    This was real lol...:good
     
  15. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Yawn. Go lay down some of that tasty analization on someone else, you bore me rigid 'lol'.