How can we be sure guys like Cadel Evans, Choc, Green and other guys aren't juicing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dr Gonzo, Oct 22, 2012.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dawsosj

    dawsosj Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,690
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    It is not relevant at all and only serves to prove you are a fanatical sociopath. That does not explain why you don't try to expose him, the real reason is because you have no substantiated evidence and would be shot down in flames, have you ever had the gatorade that you make yourself from the powder? it is a lot thicker than regular gatorade, or perhaps it was frozen originally and was in between the frozen and liquid stage? there are numerous possibilities. And he supplied a clean test to a registered doctor after the lucas fight after that little debacle, so no point bringing that up
     
  2. TCboxa

    TCboxa Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,695
    2
    Feb 13, 2010
    if he supplied a clean test the next day why wasnt it on his Fight DVD champ? :huh

    Most people who watched the footage of him drinking the Syrup conclude he was cheating, it wasnt frozen, it wasnt powder Gateraid. The bottles are not supposed to be tamperd with in ANY WAY..

    This content is protected


    As you see, here is the Orignal Bottle, this is the real stuff

    This content is protected


    Then its switched for the GO GO Juice that picks him up. Its not the same colour as the fluid above and is alot thicker.

    This content is protected


    Now he is drinking legit poweraid.

    There is to be no pre mixing of drinks via powder, its all to be from un-open sealed bottles and only bottles/drinks that have been pre-approved. Dont take a rocket scientist to work out what they have done. And i wasnt the first person to jump on this so you cant claim im being bias and just hating on Danny now. It was in the general forum and most posters concluded he was infact cheating.

    If i wanted to expose Danny i could easly make a doco consisting of all his lies and fckups, would pretty much expose him for the dirtbag he really is but i have no desire to do such a thing, im happy enough just to talk about it on a boxing forum as are others but thanks for the idea, ill put it on the shelf for a rainy day and if i want to cash in ill go make that doco, im sure MANY of fans would purchase it :good
     
  3. dawsosj

    dawsosj Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,690
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    thats a stupid thing to say, green represented aus at the olympics and knocked down the eventual gold medallist alexand lebziak, mundine showed that he can be an excellent boxer, but never made it for whatever reasons, dib is still unproven imo, geale is an excellent boxer, as for the only two real boxers , they are not even from australia :lol:.

    As for you TC, if this world were based on assumptions then we would all be in a lot of trouble, provide me with some tests, or conclusive evidence from proffessionals that he is a drug cheat. Untill then, you are just another forum poster with an opinion like everybody else.
     
  4. Francis75

    Francis75 FAB 4 Full Member

    14,392
    3,047
    Oct 1, 2007
    Ty is making some very compelling arguments here that even the staunchest of Greeny supporters will find hard to defend. Team Greens secrets are getting unraveled here tonight.
     
  5. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :lol:
     
  6. dawsosj

    dawsosj Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,690
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    Not particularly, with Ty it's like banging your head against a brick wall, he refuses to acknowledge anybody elses point of view, i have given up trying to argue with him, i am content in my beliefs and will carry on as im sure he will.
     
  7. dawsosj

    dawsosj Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,690
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    if your going to be a troll at least find some sort of a gimmick, like 20a87 with his "brah" and constant mundine campaign, in short your trolling is weak and boring.
     
  8. dawsosj

    dawsosj Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,690
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    Not really, why come onto an australian boxing forum if you have no interest in any of our boxers? everyone has an opinion, and yours seems to be very cynical and misguided.
     
  9. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Ooh TCboxa it must be liquid whacky backy look at the grin on Greeny's phizog, he's sterned dewd :lol:
     
  10. TCboxa

    TCboxa Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,695
    2
    Feb 13, 2010
    You havent even tried to debate points ive raised, so what exactly is it that your banging your head against again? :hey Hard to acknowledge anything you say as you really dont put up any valid points that counter anything ive raised.

    If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck its most likely a duck. People have no hard evidence pacman was on PEDs but its pretty obvise he had been taking something and has since stoped due to all the publicity he recieved over it. You dont even debate the thick substance Green was drinking other than to say it may have been frozen (which wouldnt make it thick) and or that it was poweder Gateraid (which isnt permited) so you really dont offer any valid points to debate and are more frustrated with the points ive raised more than anything :good
     
  11. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    You always use this word 'debate' as if you've got half an idea of what it means.

    What's there to debate? You've done nothing but speculate and throw in a few "Oh I know this guy from Albury who was asked to join Green's camp specifically to juice him up" - funny how Albury appears to be the nerve centre of knowledge on supplements and all things boxing...

    Back up your claims and sell your story to a newspaper - like people have said, you'll be paid well for your information, as long as you can prove it.

    Oh, but no, it would have to be a "collective" effort :lol:

    Don't just keep repeating it on an internet forum in the hope it gathers some moss as it rolls along :deal
     
  12. Francis75

    Francis75 FAB 4 Full Member

    14,392
    3,047
    Oct 1, 2007
    Dawsosj > Boxer555.:hi:
     
  13. globeman

    globeman Active Member Full Member

    957
    6
    Feb 24, 2012
    Cadel is the Golden Boy for the squeaky clean image & surprisingly with what has happened with Lance Armstrong his name has been pushed under the rug by the Aussie media. Either they have nothing or they've been told to drop it so as not to bring the sport into more disrepute.
     
  14. Nigelbro

    Nigelbro Active Member Full Member

    611
    0
    Sep 23, 2012
    TC doesn't need to provide evidence for his claims on the 3 photos as it is an observation.
    Three different bottles is not an opinion it is an observable fact.
    Speculation would be to question the IBO, their testing, catchweights etc.

    Arrogance is also an observable fact for anybody who has come across the green camp OR the fact that they disguised the bottle to look DIFFERENT to the real bottle.
    There is not always a smoking gun and circumstantial evidence IS enough to convict a person if there is enough weight. Ask Lance.
    Circumstantial evidence still has to be defended and dismissed. That is different from an accusation.
    Unless someone addresses the bottle thing then TCS observation is correct. The taped up bottle is circumstantial evidence that Danny Green cheated. Fact.
    Danny Green is a cheater, hearsay.
    What was in it? Opinion.
     
  15. dawsosj

    dawsosj Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,690
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    The taped bottle is evidence that bittles with cold liquid in the weep and may slip from sweaty hand such as those of the people in the corner, this was prevented by putting sports tape on it for better grip? It was the same for the dominquez fight in the states. It only has to be defended if it comes from a credible organisation rather than an internet poster , as for the arrogance, that is opinion, i have never encountered what i would call arrogance personally but each to their own.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.