How come everyone that fights floyd "tires?"

OSCAR 34
MARQUEZ 36
MOSLEY 38

FLOYD 33..SO DOES FLOYD GET OLD AT 34 LIKE OSCAR? SO IF FLOYD LOSES I GUESS THE ARGUMENT WILL BE HE IS OLD CUZ HE WILL BE 34 AND OSCAR WAS 34 WHEN FLOYD FOUGHT HIM TOO N ERYONE ON ESB TALK LIKE OSCAR WAS OLD AS FU34...

BTW SHANE LOOKS PRETTY GOOD HERE IN THE LAST ROUND OF MARGARITO-MOSLEY:goodHIS AGE PLAYED INTO IT OK..BUT HAD IT BEEN MARGARITO IN FRONT OF SHANE SATURDAY SHANE WOULDA SHOWN U SOMETHING LIKE THIS..STYLES MAKE FIGHTS MAN :good J
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFTAZi27trk[/ame]

 

floyd will have every advantage over pac too...aside from power....he is faster, stronger, more coordinated, superior footwork (control the tempo), better defense, longer arms, better counter punching..

 

MAN WILL U STFU...U GOT OWNED...U TALKED A LOTTA SH1T U COULDNT BACK UP..

AGAIN...I WATCH THE SPORT LIL HOMIE..PROBABLY FORGET MORE THAN U EVER KNOW....U PERCEPTION ON WHO I AM IS IRRELEVANT IN THE ARGUMENT ANYWAYS...

ALL U SHOW IS THAT U HAVE NO GOOD REBUTTAL....UR ARGUMENT IS WEAK SO THERES NOTHING U CAN REALLY SAY ....SO U CRITICIZE INSTEAD....I DO IT TOO MAN BUT ITS USUALLY IN THREADS INVOLVING OTHER FIGHTERS...

SO YA I CAN BE ALL THAT BUT PLEASE JUST COMMENT ON THE POST AND TALK BOXING..:deal YOUR PERCEPTION OF WHO I AM DOESN'T HELP YOUR ARGUMENT ANY:hat

 

BTW, WHAT I SAID WAS TRUE...HE WILL HAVE THOSE ADVANTAGES DUMBAZZ...IM NOT SAYING IT FROM THE STANDPOINT OF A FAN...FLOYD WILL HAVE EACH OF THOSE ADVANTAGES ASIDE FROM POWER IN THE HANDS...MAYBE SPEED IS A TOSS UP...BUT TECHNICALLY FLOYD IS SUPERIOR AS FAR AS "BOXING SKILLS"...

GO TALK TO A LOCAL TRAINER ABOUT WHAT GOOD FOOTWORK DOES FOR A FIGHTER IN A FIGHT...IF FLOYD TURNS IT INTO A "BOXING MATCH" AS HE DID WITH SHANE HE WILL STAY BEHIND HIS JAB ALL NIGHT AND WONT OPEN UP TO GET CAUGHT..HE COULD EASILY OUTPOINT PAC...GO AHEAD N TELL ME ABOUT HOW PAC WILL PRESSURE BLAH BLAH BLAH..OK HE'LL PRESSURE HIM AND THROW A LOT OF PUNCHES..OK I HEARD THAT ONE..GOOD STUFF...THATS THE WAY TO BEAT FLOYD...UR RIGHT....ACTUALLY IT USED TO BE THIS......"U HAVE TO BE A BIG STRONG WW, WITH GOOD BOXING ABILITY, GOOD PUNCHING POWER, AND BE SMART"...BUT NOW SINCE SHANE GOT BEAT ITS "U HAVE TO BE A LITTLE GUY,THROWING A LOT OF PUNCHES, THAT CAN GET IN AND GET OUT"....WHEN PAC GETS BEAT IT WILL BE "IT HAS TO BE A MW, BIG GUY, COMES STRAIGHT FORWARD, LIKE KELLY PAVLIK...

CMON MAN...WHAT CAN PAC DO "TECHNICALLY" SPEAKING WITH THAT POOR AZZ FOOTWORK TO MAKE IT A "FIGHT" AND TAKE IT OUT OF BEING A "BOXING MATCH?" JUST DONT SEE IT:bart

FLOYD HAS THE SUPERIOR FOOTWORK AND HE WILL CONTROL THE TEMPO OF THE FIGHT USING HIS SUPERIOR FOOTWORK....

IM NOT EVEN TRYING TO BE A DI34 HOMIE....JUSS TELLIN IT LIKE I C IT..OF COURSE U GONNA COME BACK WITH A "FU34 YOU" CUZ U DONT KNOW HOW TO RESPOND TO A GOOD POST

 

:goodu wont....ill admit it striaght up my man

 

CUZ IT WAS A POINTLESS DEADBEAT ARGUMENT....UR NOT GONNA AGREE WITH ME N I AINT GONNA AGREE WITH YOU.....U THE ONE THAT KEPT IT GOING...I EVEN TOLD U I WAS AGREEING TO DISAGREE....PERSONALLY I THINK UR ARGUMENT IS WHACK....BASED ON UR ARGUMENT I THINK U JUST DONT LIKE FLOYD AND NE THING HE DOES REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT IS REALLY....UR FACTS/SOURCES BEHIND WHAT YOU SAY IN A LOT OF UR POSTS IS WAY OFF IN SOME WAY....SO I WAS LIKE FU34 IT:hat

NE WAYS STFU AND ANSWER THE POST OR DONT POST WHEN I DO...LIKE I SAID BEFORE U GOT UR OPINION N ITS BACKED WITH SOME BULLSH1T BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS..PEACE OUT....

 

WELL PUT IT LIKE THIS....THIS BOARD WAS BLOWING UP ABOUT SHANE WHEN HE KNOCKED TONY...HOW FLOYD WOULDNT FIGHT HIM ETC....

THAN U ASK ABOUT SKILL...ILL POINT OUT HOW MUCH OF IT WAS SKILL BY USING THE 2ND ROUND AS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHY FLOYD IS SO GOOD....

NOT SURE IF U EVER BOXED..DONT SEEM LIKE IT FROM WHAT U KNOW BUT WHEN U HURT U SUPPOSED TO SMOTHER AND TIE UP...UR TAUGHT TO 'CATCH' THE PUNCH IF U CAN....FLOYD GOT HIT CLEAN AND FLUSH, TOOK THE MUTHA FU34A, AND DID EVERYTHING RIGHT...THE FIRST RIGHT THAT LANDED WAS NEVER BROUGHT BACK BY SHANE..THE SECOND ONE THE SAME THING....

U PROBABLY WONT UNDERSTAND WHAT IM SAYING....BUT A FIGHTER WHO "KNOWS HOW TO FIGHT HURT" LIKE THAT IS A BEAST....SAY WHAT YOU WANT ABOUT KO POWER AND ALL THAT....BUT WHEN U KNOW HOW TO BE VERSATILE ALL THE WAY UP TO A POINT OF BEING HURT AND YOU HAVE BEEN DOING IT SINCE U WAS YOUNG..THAT COUPLED WITH THE FACT THAT YOU A GYM RAT AND CONSTANTLY "PRACTICING" SHOWS WHY FLOYD IS GREAT AT WHAT HE DOES...U DO KNOW THAT HIS CAMP DOES INVOLVE DRILLS IN HOW TO FIGHT WHEN "HURT" DONT U???? FROM WHAT I HAVE HEARD AND UNDERSTAND HIS CAMP GETS VERY TECHNICAL AS FAR AS "BOXING" GOES AND THATS WHAT IS PRACTICED..EVEN UP TO THE POINT OF HOW TO "TECHNICALLY" FIGHT WHEN HURT

IMO IT WAS MORE FLOYD THAN SHANES AGE...WHEN SHANE GOT TONY HURT TONY DIDNT KNOW HOW TO HANG ON..HE WAS NEVER TAUGHT THAT IN A BOXING GYM..NEVER DID DRILLS....SO WHEN SHANE HURT HIM WETHER IT BE IN THE 2ND ROUND OR 9TH ROUND TONY DIDNT KNOW HOW TO ADAPT TO THAT..HE DIDNT KNOW HOW TO CHANGE HIS STYLE TO A PURE DEFENSIVE STYLE CUZ HIS BRAIN JUST GOT RATTLED...

FLOYD DID...THATS THE DIFFERENCE IN THESE FIGHTERS RIGHT THERE....THAT ONE ASPECT SHOULD EXPLAIN ALOT IF U TRULY UNDERSTAND THE SWEET SCIENCE..

NOT SAYING U DONT NOR AM I SAYING WHAT U SAY IS WRONG....BUT WHEN U HAVE " TECHNICALLY" LEARNED HOW TO FIGHT WHEN HURT U R DANGEROUS IN THAT RING...MAYBE HE WONT 1 PUNCH KNOCK U OUT..BUT WHATEVER MAYWEATHER U FIGHTING IS DANGEROUS...EVEN WHEN HURT HE CAN COME RIGHT BACK, MAKE IT INTO A "BORING FIGHT" AS SOME CALL IT, AND BOX THE **** OUTTA U FOR THE REMAINING ROUNDS AND WIN ON THE CARDS...:deal