How come Hopkins and RJJ don't have huge following

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dilayro, Dec 30, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    There are more holes in this statement than a Golf Course.
     
    darryl1914, Dec 30, 2009
    darryl1914, Dec 30, 2009
    #16
  2. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,865
    2,110
    Feb 8, 2008

    Rjj was my all time favorite fighter, he was too good and made his competition look really bad in his prime it worked against him because people would call them bums after he beat them... even if they went on to win a title after... Its kinda like teh heavys today Vitaly and Wlad make the others look like bums when they dominate them and it works against them.
     
    kriszhao, Dec 30, 2009
    kriszhao, Dec 30, 2009
    #17
  3. 1 Hitta Quitta

    1 Hitta Quitta Active Member Full Member

    1,155
    1
    Jul 31, 2004

    lmao!
     
    1 Hitta Quitta, Dec 30, 2009
    1 Hitta Quitta, Dec 30, 2009
    #18
  4. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    RJJ had the same problem that Hopkins had even more most of fighters he fought were B to C Level in terms of talent so they made for one sided fights that lacked drama:nono
     
    Vincent Gottschalk, Dec 30, 2009
    Vincent Gottschalk, Dec 30, 2009
    #19
  5. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    How so look at Hagler the middleweights he fought were A level in terms talent Hopkins fought second raters the middles were a weak during title run:tong
     
    Vincent Gottschalk, Dec 30, 2009
    Vincent Gottschalk, Dec 30, 2009
    #20
Page 2 of 2