How come pac PPV undercards always suck?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Forza, Apr 8, 2014.


  1. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007

    Valid point. I was just responding to why Pac's undercards suck, which is specifically Top Rank. But on average, I think Golden Boy puts together better overall undercards. Just one man's opinion.
     
  2. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    I agree last year they dominated in many ways but lets see if that continues I doubt it being that Haymon is in charge
     
  3. Enigmadanks

    Enigmadanks Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,744
    975
    Feb 5, 2009
    Well it's not Pacman's fault at all, it's Top ranks fault. Arum is under the deluded impression that boxing fans don't care about undercards.

    That line of thinking is why the pendulum has swung over to Showtime as far as putting great fight cards together.

    Alvarez-Mayweather had Ishe-Molina and Garcia-Matthyse on the undercards- the Garcia-Lucas fight is definitely a headliner on its own and would've done very good ratings on a non-PPV Showtime card.

    Some people don't like this undercard for May 3rd, but truthfully the 3 main fighters (Floyd, Broner and Khan,) could all be headliners on their own. Obviously FLoyd's would be the only PPV fight of the 3, but Khan and Broner are established stars that could headline their own cards on non-PPV Showtime.

    I'm glad Goldenboy are putting these stacked cards together, it actually gives the boxing fans true incentives to pay these astronomical PPV prices.
     
  4. kiwi_boxer

    kiwi_boxer nighty night, ellerbe ☠ ☠ ☠ banned Full Member

    5,716
    5,747
    Aug 25, 2013
    Wipe some of Floyds semen out of those eyes boy, it clearly says Mayweather. Ignorant f.uck boy. Floyds undercard has to have value as the main event is a waste of time. The only semi competitive/exciting fight on the card is Khan vs Collazo & you know it.

    At least Pacquiao vs Bradley is a competitive and an exciting fight to watch.
     
  5. remi

    remi Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    0
    Jul 7, 2008
    Some of you on here are a bunch of little bitches. For real, anything and everything that mayweather does, you guys seem to have a problem with it. Shouldn't you be happy that his cards are stacked with good fights? Instead you guys are are trying to proclaim that he only does it because he needs to in order to get 1 million views. Pac's cards are ****, but he gets a pass because in some of your eyes, it doesn't matter because he can do it without the undercard.

    What do you guys want from Mayweather? Is it jealousy? When he fights a guy bigger than him, you guys aren't happy and always find some dumb **** to say like the guys was too slow. If he fights a guy with speed, then it becomes he stayed away from the big powerful puncher that can hurt him. If he fights and older fighter, he's shot. If he fights a younger one, then he's too green. WTF is wrong with the boxing public today?

    Could we see some better fights, of course we can? Is it all mayweather's fault that the expired dream match up between him and Pac didn't happen, no no,no, but yet peole still blame him when he clearly offered Pac 40 million more than he ever got in his life and Pac still refused. What do you want him to do other than just go his way and let Pac goes his own way.

    People complain that Mayweather only fights the same type of fighters, ok, then why don't you same knuckle heads bash pac for doing just that. Marquez 4x and maybe a
    5th, Bradley 2x, david Diaz a slow ass paper champion, Cotto a good fight but making him come down in weight, Oscar, haha, that was just plain stupid and easy pickings that Oscar had not been at 147 in about 7 years decided to go down, but a whole year earlier made mayweather go up to 154 and mayweather got no praise for beating him but Pac got crowned king for beating someone that the public said was shot, go figure.

    I understand you love Pac, and that is cool. I think he is a terrific fighter, only and I say only against stationary fighters. Has Pac ever fought someone slick with speed? The answer is No!

    Lastly, I had mentioned this a few times and I will do so again, please be objective and go back to the last time Pac knocked anyone out. Don't you notice that ever since the whole allegation thing about steroids or being on something he hasn't looked as fast, as strong, and especially the knockouts stopped coming. Why, all of a sudden this all stopped? He was knocking out legitimate fighters at their own weights and all of a sudden the knockouts stop. It makes me wonder!
     
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Promoters know they can show anything and the boxing fans will watch. The promoters will not spend any more on making the fans happy, they actually make fun of the fans...........
     
  7. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    Have you finished your rant ?
     
  8. uranage

    uranage Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,350
    891
    Aug 17, 2011


    All I got to say is HAIL HYDRA!!!!
     
  9. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    how many times it is going to be said, 40m is a laughable offer you ****ing dense of an idiot.

    40m - taxes - arum's cut =~ the same **** pac is getting in his last few fights.

    "but arum lied and pac is paid peanuts"

    yep.

    but he owns gazillions in taxes.:rofl:rofl:lol:
     
  10. str1

    str1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,106
    263
    May 8, 2006
    Hail Hydra!! :deal
     
  11. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    What the other guy said, 40m is laughable. But lots more idiocies in this puddle of tears
     
  12. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    Because the spread isn't worth it.

    If Bradley/Pac II does, for example, 700k PPV buys like the first did, with a horrible undercard, the only difference that Bradley/Pac II with a GOOD underdcard would do would be like an additional 30k or something. Not enough to compensate for the additional purses of fighters to generate undercard interest and also lose out on the revenue that those "entertaining" or "big draw" fighters would generate on their own card filling their own venue. Most people are either going to buy it or not based solely on the main event.
     
  13. kiwi_boxer

    kiwi_boxer nighty night, ellerbe ☠ ☠ ☠ banned Full Member

    5,716
    5,747
    Aug 25, 2013
    Didn't read. You mad? :thumbsup
     
  14. STB

    STB #noexcuses Full Member

    15,486
    41
    Mar 26, 2014
    Well its no Raymundo Beltran against Arash Usmanee...:patsch

    Pretty sure Broner has more world titles personally than the entire Pac-Bradley undercard put together.
     
  15. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,888
    Nov 27, 2010
    arums undercards always suck