How come USADA even did drug testing for Mayweather v Berto

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Sep 28, 2015.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    You do know USADA don't test Olympic athletes right?
     
  2. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    WADA does testing for the Olympics not USADA you buffoon
     
  3. Str8ryte

    Str8ryte Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,943
    95
    Apr 27, 2012
    Meanwhile, back at the ranch...

    Damn, you phaggots need lives. Smh.
     
  4. Zimornsky

    Zimornsky King Fluid IV = CHEAT banned

    6,168
    11
    Dec 6, 2014
    Lemmie guess... You're a PED Jr. fan?
     
  5. bw51

    bw51 Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    89
    Dec 12, 2012
    i think he is referring to the fact they train at the same gym and were groomed by the same trainer

    do you know sh!t about baaxing?
     
  6. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    Well that's not the same stable.

    And if Pacquiao fanboy Gimperial wants to say having the same trainer and same gym means you are a cheat then he must admit Pacquiao is a cheat because he had the same trainer and same gym as James Toney and Justin Fortune :hi:

    Brook is as British as they come and despises the idea of cheating. :nod
     
  7. bw51

    bw51 Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    89
    Dec 12, 2012
    i am just explaining to what he intended to write, it does not take a genius...

    fact is...ghalad and brook are boys....anyone who knows british boxing knows this

    i agree this doesn't mean brook is dodgy, i am simply explaining to you want to guy meant....brook and KG are tight
     
  8. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    I know this. At what point have I ever denied it?
     
  9. bw51

    bw51 Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    89
    Dec 12, 2012
    if you want to be technical, no you did not deny it. instead you counter- argued with a point that aimed to prove Brook is a clean fighter but not necessarily addressing what he stated.

    he is basically saying, you cannot be 100% sure brook is clean because there is evidence to suggest PEDS are circulating within that group of fighters through Ghalad. Whether they are stable mates, gym buddies or gay lovers, they are closely tied through their love of boxing. Guilty through association, although not valid in boxing perse, is something that can raise suspicion. So there is some truth to what he is saying.

    That is all. I do hear what you are saying though.
     
  10. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    There is no truth to what he is saying. As I said to him- if Brook was dirty why did he not give two hoots about who did the testing whereas Porter's team did everything they could to wriggle out of it.

    Galahad failed for a substance that would show in any test. So why hasn't Brook?
     
  11. Holy Grail

    Holy Grail Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,055
    52
    Sep 13, 2013
    That's because USADA is in Mayweather's and Haymon's pockets. This is quite obvious except to the delusional flom****s and there's a clear conflict of interests happening there.
     
  12. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    :nod

    If Pacquiao had won and done the same stuff the fight would've already been declared an NC
     
  13. hofbrau

    hofbrau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,944
    0
    Mar 20, 2011
    :lol:
     
  14. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    PED apologists like you need to be taken outside and shot in your glass face.
     
  15. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    2,157
    Feb 8, 2008
    :lol::lol::lol: