How could anyone have williams winning more than 3 rounds?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hay3maker, Dec 6, 2009.


  1. Hay3maker

    Hay3maker Member Full Member

    174
    0
    Nov 1, 2009
    Martinez landed hard flush shots to williams face all night and completely schooled him, to be honest the only three rounds I gave Williams were pity rounds where martinez wasn't dominating as much.

    This was the biggest robbery of this decade.
     
  2. D.Will

    D.Will Active Member Full Member

    969
    0
    Jan 25, 2008
    and thats why you post on a forum and don't judge real fights.
     
  3. pugilist_boyd

    pugilist_boyd BUSTED UP PUG Full Member

    830
    3
    Jun 19, 2007
    i thought martinez won it,but i was scared hed get robbed-and he did
     
  4. Hay3maker

    Hay3maker Member Full Member

    174
    0
    Nov 1, 2009
    let me guess your from the US and a paul williams fan?

    am I right???:lol:
     
  5. truushot

    truushot Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,320
    1
    Jun 21, 2009
    You sir are a complete joke.
     
  6. FlatNose

    FlatNose Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,800
    25
    Feb 16, 2006
    This was a close fight, and Williams deserved the edge. The one scorecard that had Martinez winning only one round was ridiculous. Even a draw or a close win for Martinez would have been acceptable. A rematch would be appropriate.
     
  7. Hay3maker

    Hay3maker Member Full Member

    174
    0
    Nov 1, 2009
    Americans showing thier true colours yet again in this thread:yep
     
  8. kracka81

    kracka81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,142
    1
    May 1, 2008
    i agree this was not the biggest robbery of the decade i thought martinez won but barely so there for it could have went either way. i think the judge that had it even was the closest 110-119 was ridiculous
     
  9. jonesjrp4p1

    jonesjrp4p1 16 yr old prodigy Full Member

    1,575
    15
    Mar 31, 2007
    i had it 7-5 williams but could very well see it 7-5 for martinez or even a draw. there was so many close rounds. but the 119-110 was absolutely ridiculous
     
  10. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    Can someone ban this idiot. It's obvious he's trolling for reactions.
     
  11. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    13
    Dec 2, 2008
    I scored it twice and had Williams winning 116-113 both times. I scored every round the same as the first time I scored it. It was a great fight. Everyone is bickering and debating about this, like it was a terrible decision. 119-110 was terrible. The other scorecards I can see. I definitely think Willliams won the fight.
     
  12. yyyy1313

    yyyy1313 Active Member Full Member

    1,475
    0
    Mar 29, 2007
    They should get it on again, first fight was fun. The second fight should prove who's the man!
     
  13. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Would you grow up already with this nationalist garbage! We are boxing fans who are discussing boxing. What the hell does it matter where you live! If you want to school somebody, then school them with your observations about the actual fight or your boxing knowledge. Stop insulting other countries.
     
  14. nastynas

    nastynas Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,935
    10
    Oct 27, 2009
    I had him winning four rounds, and 2 even.

    Rounds 5,6,7, and 9.

    I had rounds 1 and 11 even.
     
  15. dublynflya

    dublynflya Stand your ground Son!! Full Member

    5,727
    7
    Oct 30, 2009
    Sorry mate, i've got to totally disagree with you!! You only gave Williams 3 "Pity rounds" (What IS a "Pity round"? Because I don't believe that is a scoring criteria :smile:) well I gave it to Williams. It was a very competitive fight and whilst the 119-110 score was obviously a joke (What fight was that "Judge" watching??) the 114-114 was also (Imo) wrong. And to call it "The biggest robbery of the decade" just sets you up for ridicule.