How did Alex Leapai "earn" this title fight???

this

 

Which is ironic since so many Klitards like to make claims against past greats fights guys with losses who bear nobodies. Leapai lost to a guy that was 33-23 and was stopped by featherfisted Kevin Johnson who himself never beat a top 10 fighter. Ohh the double standards of Klitards!!! :rofl

 

This makes Khan look like a solid pick for Mayweather

 

It make Khan-Mayweather look like a super fight!! I hate Floyd, but if Wlad makes more than a million for this atrocity of a fight than Floyd deserves at least 50 mil.

 

Pacquiao was ko'd by a nobody. how did manny go after that?

u could pick apart any boxer in history if u choose to only look at negatives.

 

Im not the one who goes on about the opposition having losses. Personally I think losses are no big deal when you've shown a willingness to fight the best. When I judge a fighter its by who he's fought and who his opposition fought. Do that for Leapai and you come up with an incredibly weak challenger for the heavyweight championship yet again.

 

what they make should have zero bearing on u.

it astounds me when people make serious comment on what boxers pay should be.

I've seen fights between 2 complete no-names that put on such a great fight, that it was a shame that they were likely paid very little.

if u saw the match on paper, I bet u would say, they should be paid $200 or something, even though they put on a better show than most of floyds 40 million dollar fights.

 

every single heavyweight contender has a record that looks terrible as a possible candidate to face a klit brother. that's the problem that is forgotten imo.

yes leapai's form is thin. yes he'll likely lose. but nobody has said that this is a super-fight for the ages. it's a guy who appears out of his depth and has a punchers chance at best.

the main thing I personally like is that alex will not be intimidated by wlad imo. and he will let his punches go when in the ring, rather than just try and survive for 12 rounds.