How did Corbett's contemporaries view him?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Melankomas, Aug 16, 2023.


  1. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,901
    8,578
    Dec 18, 2022
    In the debate of Corbett's technical prowess, many say that Corbett was not a technician but instead was an Ali\RJJ-like fighter who relied on speed and athleticism. Can this be backed up by writings? Did anyone critique Corbett's technique?
     
  2. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,058
    21,092
    Sep 22, 2021
    As the inventor of the left hook no less
     
  3. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    17,107
    28,023
    Aug 22, 2021
    Unfortunately I can’t recall specifics but I think I’ve read a few assessments on Corbett by the fighters of his day.

    I “think” Jeffries complimented Corbett as being the cleverest boxer he had ever faced and/or seen.

    Less flatteringly, Jack Johnson labelled Corbett a Fancy Dan who knew how to run from trouble - but then you have to wonder when Johnson saw Corbett fight in the flesh, if ever. Perhaps he did, I’m not sure but the available films of Corbett are scant otherwise.

    Perhaps to us now, Corbett might appear to have relied more on natural athleticism than technique - but in his day and compared to his contemporaries he probably displayed a lot more identifiable technique in the context of his times.

    His actually trying to avoid being hit was a step up from a lot of face first fighters of his day. Lol.
     
    Sailor Joe likes this.
  4. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,901
    8,578
    Dec 18, 2022
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,425
    9,399
    Jul 15, 2008
    We all know that Corbett looked at times silly in the few films that exist but when you keep in mind the sport was morphing and that he had very few actual fights it's fair to say he was a work in progress .. there is little doubt that at his best he was superbly conditioned and lightning fast .... I recently reread Tunney's thoughts on Corbett after they sparred , saying he was astonished at how fast and terrific he was, the he thought hen was actually better than Benny Leonard skill wise at the time ... this was the Tunney soon to fight Dempsey the first time and before anyone goes discounting Tunney, here's Ali on that same Tunney ...

    This content is protected
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,570
    27,209
    Feb 15, 2006
    Two ringside accounts from 1882:

    "In action he is quick on his feet, very shifty, and one of the most scientific and cleverest boxers that ever stepped into the ring. Corbett demonstrates his ability to guard admirably, duck cleverly, get away in good style, and do quick and active execution with his dukes."

    "Nobody can question his cleverness. He displayed science last night, seldom seen in the ring. He is shifty, quick as a cat, jumps like a lightweight, ducks cleverly, but would never impress an audience as a man likely to defeat Sullivan."