How did JMM become elite if his only claim for fame was a KD 4 times against pac?

It could be that Pac is seen as an unstoppable force and supposedly people can see him beating the bigger guys at 140 and 147 but then u got this lil guy named JMM who is really only a 130 lbr who has no physical advantages oveer Pac yet still manages to make him look foolish at times and very beatable.

Why do u think Pac didnt want the 3rd fight when GBP offered him 6 or 7 mil for a 3rd match and Pac ended up taking 3 mil to fight Diaz?

JMM is very gifted. Thats why he is starting to get the fame.

 

J.M.M is elite because he took punches from Norwood, Pac, Barrera, and many others and never came close to a 10 count. PAc has been ko'd twice, and beaten by a past it Morales who if he was in his prime, would've proven that he was superior to Pac in every way. Styles make fights. J.M.M never ko'd, and Pac ko'd twice. Yeah, Pac got knockdowns...lol, so what. J.M.M never took a 10 count in 3 rounds or less TWICE! I know, Pac was 5 when it happened lol...

 

Im suprised you are saying this harrison...Because if JMM is so average then it doesnt look good for Pacman does it? Seeing as though JMM gave him so much trouble, the vast majority seeing their series as at least 1 a piece. And he is more or less the best fighter he has faced who was in their prime.

JMM is pretty overrated though...He deserves a bit of credit thats for sure but in a historical sense I dont consider him that good to be honest.

 

whatarock. How is he overrated?
This guy has been in the shadows the whole time and has shown he can pretty much deal with anyone even if they are faster, stronger, and younger.

The only thing he has is avg speed and power and a lot of techinical skill which was aqcuired from years of being a student of boxing.

 

Because people consider him one of the greatest featherweights of alltime and some kind of ultra skilled superman with almost no equals, without knowing dick about the history of the division.

The list of fighters who would have beaten JMM is long..Doesnt mean he isnt an excellent fighter but people's scope of things tends to be narrow when talking about him

 

JMM is like saddler, without pac(pep) he is nothing

 

:roll:

 

well Pacdbest, since you consider Pac to be a greater fighter than Mike Tyson and Muhammed Ali combined, what else are you going to call the man who beat him twice and got robbed both times?

 

I wish I would see a Pac fan type that Pac is greater than Ali lol. I wish I would... Heck, Pac isn't even greater than Mike McCallum.

 

I'm pretty sure that Harrison is secretly convinced that Pac could move to MW and take out Pavlik if he really wanted to.

 

Once again, resumes dont tell you how good a fighter is.

 

Agreed. As a Pacquiao fan, it doesn't make sense to question one of your fighter's best wins. Then again, the intelligence of Pacquiao fans has always been questioned.

 

what!!!!!!!!:huh

man, say it isn't so. that is one of the worst statements i have ever heard.

For the lack of a perfect tool for measuring achievement, success etc., the resume is the best tool available, probably not the perfect tool in the world.

resumes are there to allow people to make an intelligent assessment based on available facts, like number of fights, won, knock-outs.

if resumes don't count to you, i don't know what would.