How did many rounds did you give to Froch against Ward? Can Froch beat him?

Except I didn't make that comparison or push my opinion on the fight as holding any degree of authority. No, said I scored two, as in I know he earned that; the 'maybe' is for not ruling out possibly giving him a close third upon rewatching. That presumption of yours is off, lolbailey..

Yet I made no such defence nor is that fabricated position mine, so again that delusional projection perfectly fits you being an operative of the troll hive-mind.

It was a good win for him, but of course we all know that you argue Calzaghe's "master class" over 'prime' Jones was far better, so no worries!

 

Pretty shallow there actually, but I'm sure they're seemingly approaching Mariana Trench-depth for your intellect.

The 'lolbailey' was aimed at YOU personally, in particular your consistency, which I applaud. Notice how I separated the rest of my post, because that was casually for the topic in general, not you...get over yourself. You treat it as meant for direct comparison to yours, that's the false presumption. Obviously it was open for anyone to respond, hence my entertaining your nonsense to a degree.

It's no one's fault but your own that you immediately entered deluded-defensive-mode by insisting on reading too much into it and making fabricated (non-)arguments, you muppet.

Loving how ironically you've got nothing to twist as back-up for this and thus predictably you completely avoid addressing it:

And that was in response to my first post here:

Where did I big up or make excuses for Froch? Where's that defensive case for Ward that you spout I made? All you have is a pathetic strawman based on nothing but your ridiculous agenda.

Hey, it's your world; other people are just confusing apparitions for you to project genuine nonsense onto. You argue the Jones win was far better than Froch, that's cool, no need for further argument :hi:

 

Im saying Froch got 1 round on my scorecard and 2 other rounds were probably close, all the rest were not close so I could see how you could give Froch a maximum of 3 rounds
I cant even reply to someone who had it 116-114, you probably had Bellew beating Chilemba and Purdy beating Alexander, if the judges didnt have it close for whatver reason they did you wouldnt have had it close because you woulda looked like a ****** so your just using the judges dodgy scoring for your own benefit

 

No he can't beat him, unless it's an against-the-grain KO

You can give Froch 2 or 3, but then again you could very reasonably score it a shutout.

 

One round maybe??

The thing to notice is while Froch was being dominated, he didnt/couldnt do anything to change what was happening. It was the same story round after round. Carl doesnt strike me as an intelligent fighter in this way, he has his gameplan and if it doesnt work, he loses.

Ward - Froch two would be the boring white wash it was the first time round.