How did Pac get 120 points on 2 scorecards?

"As a result of legal blow"

Section never mentioned provisions regarding judge scoring a call.

Learn how to interpret a rule book. Lawyers will grill your ass boy.

 

Yeah, it's bad scoring but unlike disregarding a KD called by a referee (which is not allowd as per the rule), it is allowed and can be done by the judge. I have not seen the judges' by round scorecards, but supposing this scoring:

119-108 - Judge scored 10-9 for mosley
120-108 - Judged scored 10-10
120-107 - Judged scored 10-9 for pac (which is wrong and cannot be done)

or it could be possible that he scored 10-10 for the round (judge discretion) but in another round, he scored 10-8 for Pac (judge discretion again). I know 10-8 in any round without a KD is not a good score but he could have viewed the round as absolute domination in the absence of any effort from Mosley.

 

Didn't Mickey Vann decide to deduct a point from Whittaker in the Chavez fight for a low blow without the ref telling him to?:roflatsch

 

You could not be more wrong in your argument here. Not this post, necessarily, but what you're trying to argue.

Iole's point is that the judge has the discretion to score the round how he/she sees it, regardless of what the referee rules on a knockdown. Which makes sense, right, because if judges did not have discretion in how they scored rounds then every judge would score every round of every fight the same based upon supposedly-set-in-stone criteria.

Taking a point off for a knockdown is a practice, a tradition. It is not a mandate. And this gives the judges discretion to make-up for a blown call as Bayless' was last night.

The only mandate in scoring, that I'm aware of, is the 10 point must system rule. You win or tie the round, you have to get 10 points. The rest seems pretty flexible, even if their are traditional standards.

To put it simply: The judges don't have to score anything, except for the winning/tying person in the round to get 10 points. The rest is up to their discretion, and that's what you saw exercised last night.

 

It only states a KD call but never metioned about scoring. The section wasn't very specific. :rofl:rofl:rofl

I'm little boy. There are gray lines in rule book boy, it can be exploited.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/09/14/s...w-blow-lead-to-whitaker-s-undoing.html?src=pm

Yes it was a joke. And the judges who gave that round 10-9 to Pac do not know the rules either.

 

He can't comprehend that.

 

"A judge has the power to look into a call" - Kevin Iole

Hence one judge give it 10-9 to Pacman.

 

Apparently not.

 

Show me something from the rule book saying that, not Iole.