How did Pac get 120 points on 2 scorecards?

The judges are wise enough to disregard the referee's call. It was not a punch but a shove. Moron!

 

Ref Bayless actually retracted that call after the fight. He even apologized to Roach for the miscall.

 

I believe the sanctioning body review fights, correct?
If the community makes enough noise about this one, then maybe it's something that can be brought to their attenion and of course be resolved (clarification, rule ammendment, suspension, whatever)

 

why did the judge score it 10-7 in the first round for JMM?

 

Judges make bad decisions just like when a judge did not correctly score the Pac-JMM 1 a 10-6 round which caused Pac his 2nd win against JMM (that is more significant than this 120 etc because even if the referee awarded Mosley 5 KDs in that round, mosley still would lose whereas this one, it cost a fighter a win)


**** happens.




And besides, based on how Divac scores a fight, that round where Mosley "knocked down" Pac, Pac actaully won it 10 - 8 sans a knockdown. Since there was a knockdown, then it is a 10-10. Pac scored a 2 point swing based on landing more than 9 punches and is solidly and soundly based on Divac's modern boxing scoring system, which evened out the KD.

There you have it, the most logical explanation as to why Pac got a perfect 120 score,aside of course from the other most logical theory around, the Aztecas' modern concept of fixed fights, and other conspiracies, who incdentally is a student of Divac in the wicked School of Conspiracy theories and kilometer long essays of pure bollocks and nonsense. Although Aztecas grammar is horrendous, it is understanbale as he is just a student while Divac is a teacher.

 

ffs....this debate goes straight back to square one :roflatsch.

 

Sorry, but y'all are spinning your wheels on this issue. It was a BS call that had no effect on the outcome of the fight. Next thread.