How did you score Adamek-Chambers?

I had Adamek by two rounds. Chambers was more accurate but threw something like 500 fewer punches. Adamek had some trouble early on but made key adjustments and with Chambers hand injury, he was a lot more active than Chambers from about round 4.

 

116-112 Adamek

 

115-113 Adamek. I could easily see a draw or 115-113 Chambers, though.

 

Something similar. Probably Adamek by a point.

 

119-109 Chambers

I could see maybe shifting TWO rounds to Adamek (the 6th and 12th) in addition to the one I gave him (the 9th), in which he had a significantly higher workrate but was still far less effective.

In the other nine he got absolutely schooled by someone who was just stunting on him, switching stances and throwing right crosses off of right jabs while making Adamek miss about 95% of his shots and rolling/sliding with the few grazing connects Adamek did get in (mostly rights to the body or jabs that got stuck halfway through the guard and made slight contact with Eddie's forehead).

 

If you guys think Adamek won that fight, then i really have no idea what boxing is about, I must say.:deal

 

Adamek landed easily 50 good clean body shots during the fight. Eddie showboated, talked to the crowd and didn't throw punches. Also BJ Flores is semi-******ed.

 

115-113 Chambers. . . Close fight, have no problem with a 7-5 Adamek card. . .

 

Chambers being robbed saw me lose out on a £150 proft.

119-110 was a total joke.

 

I had it 8-4 for chambers. Fan of Adamek so really I am not that disappointed:bart

 

Before I watch this, is it a good fight? Might go to sleep instead.

 

no, he just didn't want to fight Adamek when given the offer, hence the bias towards Chambers

 

116-112 Adamek.

 

115-114 Adamek. The fight I thought was there for Chambers after a great round 10, but he let himself get outworked in 11 and 12.

Neither guy is going anywhere in the HW division anyway. Both belong at cruiserweight.