How did you score De La Hoya vs. Trinidad?

7-5 for Tito :rofl:rofl:rofl

Please, do tell, what rounds you gave to Felix.

 

Seriously go on youtube (I'd do it but I can't access it from work) post up round one on here and tell me honestly that Oscar dominated that round to a point where you can't see somone giving it to Trinidad.

 

1,4,6,9,10,11,12 Tito

2,3,5,7,8 Oscar

some could have gone either way but tito was always the aggresor

Oscar beat himself that night:deal

 

Question for you; what do you think would have happened if Oscar would have had the balls to fight Tito Trinidad the last four rounds??
How do you see the fight ending??
Honestly Oscar ruined that fight for everybody including himself it should have been a great fight in the same mold of a Hearns vs. Leonard I, with Tito winning via late round KO.
And I feel very confident about that, in my opinion he robed Tito of boxing history.

 

Sounds to me like you score the fight just based on who's coming forward. no way you can score the 9th for Tito just because he was the aggressor. Oscar won that round very very clearly.

 

Question for you; what do you think would have happened if Oscar would have had the balls to fight Tito Trinidad the last four rounds??
How do you see the fight ending??
Honestly Oscar ruined that fight for everybody including himself it should have been a great fight in the same mold of a Hearns vs. Leonard I, with Tito winning via late round KO.
And I feel very confident about that, in my opinion he robed Tito of boxing history.

 

I had it 7-5 for Oscar!

 

I had Oscar beatin the mess outta Tito.

 

Oscar was the SMARTER fighter that night.
Oscar showed he had more skills in that fight.
Oscar landed the more significant punches that night.
Oscar outlanded Tito that night.
Oscar threw way more combinations that night.

Oscar gave up the last two rounds, but he took atleast 8 of the last 10, with round 10 being the closest. An argument can be made that Tito won round 10, and an argument can be made that Oscar won round 10, but I scored it even in my fairest judgement.

Why would Oscar sligg with a slugger if he didn't have too, that's pretty stupid. Oscar lost because of DON KING and nothing else.

Question: Why would one judge score round 12 for Oscar? Think about it.

 

You forgot :

Oscar fought like a little ***** for the second half of the biggest fight of the decade:deal

 

Dude, I know your a Newyorican, and Tito is your God and everything, but why the need to get so defensive and emotional over a fight that Tito got the W in????

Why do you feel the NEED to justify that W??? Is it because you know within you that Oscar deserved the win? :deal :good

 

How is that at all a counter to my argument that Oscar clearly won the 9th round?

 

Oscar must have touch Trinidad pretty well with Trinidad nose was a bloody mess and a bust up left eye.

 

Round 1 was not Trinidad round at all. Round 6? wtf.

 

Oscar won the fight, 8-4. He ran in the 11th and 12th rounds, and fought VERY defensively in the 10th. Its a myth he ran the second half of the fight.

Oscar schooled Tito in the 9th. Dominant round for him.

Oscar schooled Tito period. Showed him up, made him look clueless. Then, fought like either an arrogant amateur sitting on a lead or a coward in the last 2 frames. That taints the performance, justly.

Still, the judges gave Oscar the 12th, a round in which he didnt throw a meaningful shot, much less land one. They werent watching the fight. Don King cooking.