How did you score Giardello vs Carter?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ribtickler68, Jul 29, 2015.


  1. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
    Did you see it as a robbery, or was it a clear win for Joey as the judges had it?
     
  2. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,247
    15,294
    Jun 9, 2007
    Clear win for Joey. Carter admitted it too.
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    More importantly for the Giardello family, the courts indirectly saw it that way too.
     
  4. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Couple of points for Giardello.Sometimes a draw.

    Very close hard fought bout

    of course the sensationalised claims of robbery in the **** Carter film were nonsense, but i've never thought it was anywhere near a wide win or masterclass performance from Giardello as many started to claim in reaction to that film.

    Joey was still a fine fighter, but a faded one who's reflexes and speed had diminished.He looked more like Minter from the Antuofermo fights here...and not the more reflexively gifted slip and counter oriented fighter from the late 50s.

    Carter showed a lack of 15 round experience in his poor pacing and some plodding feet...he let Giardello turn him often and control too much space despite getting the better of many of the exchanges.

    An interesting fight.
     
  5. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    I scored it a close but clear win for Giardello. I thought he showed his age in the fight and it was there for the taking but Carter simply didnt press enough. It was Carter's fight to be had and he didnt take it. Carter even admitted after the fight that he was worried about going 15 rounds so he paced himself too much allowing Giardello to take rounds he might not have taken otherwise.